Comparison of three protocols for breathing exercises during immersion in 38 degrees C water for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Abstract

Respiratory function test, arterial blood gas analysis, and ejection fraction were used to compare three protocols of breathing exercises during immersion in 38 degrees C water. Therapy was given for 2 mo to patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Protocol A consisted of a total exercise period of 20 min/wk (10 min/day, 2 days/wk) and was performed by 7 patients (5 cases of asthma and 2 cases of emphysema). Protocol B consisted of a total exercise period of 120 min/wk (20 min x 2 per day at 10:00 am and 3:00 pm, 3 days/wk) and was performed by 9 patients (6 asthmas and 3 emphysemas). Protocol C consisted of a total exercise period of 120 min/wk (20 min/day, 6 days/wk) and was performed by 8 patients (4 asthmas and 4 emphysemas). The ratio of forced expired volume in one second to forced vital capacity (FEV1.0%) was significantly increased in protocols B and C (P < 0.01). The ratio of forced vital capacity to the predicted normal value (%FVC) was not changed in any of the three protocols. A significant increase in peak flow was observed in protocols B and C (P < 0.05). The maximal expiratory flow at 25% (V25) was not changed in any of the three protocols. PaO2 was significantly increased and PacO2 was significantly decreased in protocol B (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively), whereas only PaCO2 was significantly decreased in protocol C (P < 0.05). Ejection fraction was increased in protocols B and C. These results suggest that exercise for a total period of 120 min/wk is preferable to that of 20 min/wk in COPD.