Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1998 Mar;21(3):549-52.
doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00097.x.

Experience with a lead fixation/suture sleeve

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Experience with a lead fixation/suture sleeve

M D Gammage et al. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998 Mar.

Abstract

Current anchoring systems on pacemaker leads are crude in comparison to the lead technology. Poor anchoring technique may cause damage to the lead or early displacement from incorrect suture tension. We describe experience with a locking anchoring sleeve that applies a constant gripping force to the lead body. This can be locked and unlocked to allow optimal positioning after fixation of the sleeve to underlying tissues. The sleeve was fitted to a 55D polyurethane lead (Medtronic 4024, 7 Fr, bipolar, steroid eluting) implanted in the ventricular position in 22 patients at four European centers. All implants were uncomplicated; data were collected on handling and ease of use. Assessments were made using a scale of 1-10 (10 = excellent, 5 = equivalent to conventional sleeve). Overall ease of use compared to conventional sleeve was 7.79 +/- 0.62 (mean +/- SD). Mean scoring of flexibility of the lead at the transition points was 7.92 +/- 0.72; ability to lock/unlock the sleeve scored 6.28 +/- 1.78. Ease of suturing around the sleeve scored 8.07 +/- 0.77, and ability to slide the sleeve along the lead body scored 6.48 +/- 1.99. Chest X rays at 6 weeks showed no change in lead position with respect to postimplant films, and all leads showed a straight path on either side of the sleeve with no evidence of conductor distortion. Follow-up to 3 years has been without problem. All leads remain intact and in place, with stable thresholds and no evidence of erosion. There have been no complaints of patient discomfort. We conclude that this device is safe and effective and offers a significant advance in lead fixation.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources