A randomized controlled trial of double-versus single-gloving in vascular surgery

Abstract

With the increasing incidence of hepatitis B and HIV, and the increasing awareness of the risk and prevalence of hepatitis C, it is becoming even more necessary to adopt stricter policies to safeguard personnel and to reduce the risk of transmission. Previous studies have shown a need for eye protection, protective clothing and the use of double-gloving during operative or interventional procedures. The risk of infection is much less with unbroken skin and conversely more likely when hollow needles are used. Arguments against the routine use of double-gloving include the loss of dexterity and the discomfort incurred, and the potential loss of dexterity that might theoretically result in more rather than fewer needle-stick injuries.