Analysis of the interaction of Aeromonas caviae, A. hydrophila and A. sobria with mucins
- PMID: 9566493
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.1998.tb01130.x
Analysis of the interaction of Aeromonas caviae, A. hydrophila and A. sobria with mucins
Abstract
Aeromonas species are known to be involved in human gastrointestinal diseases. These organisms colonize the gastrointestinal tract. Aeromonas hydrophila, A. caviae, and A. sobria have been demonstrated microscopically to adhere to animal cell lines that express mucous receptors, but quantitative studies of adherence to mucosal components such as mucin have not been published to date. Purified bovine submaxillary gland, hog gastric mucin, and fish skin mucin were used as a model to study mucin-binding activity among A. caviae, A. hydrophila, and A. sobria strains. Our findings revealed that binding of radiolabeled and enzyme-conjugated mucins to Aeromonas cells varied depending on the labeling procedure. The highest binding was observed when the three mucin preparations were labeled with horseradish peroxidase. Binding of the various horseradish peroxidase-labeled mucins by A. caviae, A. hydrophila, and A. sobria cells is a common property among Aeromonas species isolated from human infections, diseased fish, and from environmental sources. The proportion of Aeromonas strains which bind the various horseradish peroxidase-labeled mucins was significantly higher for A. hydrophila than for A. caviae and A. sobria. Bacterial cell-surface extracts containing active mucin-binding components recognized the horseradish peroxidase-labeled mucins. The molecular masses of the mucin-binding proteins were estimated by SDS-PAGE and Western blot as follows: A. caviae strain A4812 (95 and 44 kDa); A. hydrophila strain 48748 (97, 45, 33 and 22 kDa); and A. sobria strain 48739 (95 and 43 kDa). Mucin interaction with Aeromonas cells was also studied in terms of growth in mucin-rich media. The culture conditions greatly influence the expression of A. hydrophila mucin-binding activity.
Similar articles
-
Different clinical characteristics among Aeromonas hydrophila, Aeromonas veronii biovar sobria and Aeromonas caviae monomicrobial bacteremia.J Korean Med Sci. 2011 Nov;26(11):1415-20. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2011.26.11.1415. Epub 2011 Oct 27. J Korean Med Sci. 2011. PMID: 22065896 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Aeromonas proteases on the binding of Aeromonas hydrophila strains to connective tissue proteins.Microbios. 1991;66(266):27-37. Microbios. 1991. PMID: 1865830
-
Biochemical and toxigenic characteristics of Aeromonas spp. isolated from diseased mammals, moribund and healthy fish.Vet Microbiol. 1988 Sep;18(1):63-71. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(88)90116-2. Vet Microbiol. 1988. PMID: 3188376
-
Septic arthritis due to Aeromonas hydrophila: case report and review of the literature.Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2005 Apr;(147):121-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-504x.2005.00338.x. Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2005. PMID: 15875648 Review.
-
[Structural and functional analysis of the serine protease from Aeromonas sobria].Yakugaku Zasshi. 2011;131(12):1781-6. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.131.1781. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2011. PMID: 22129876 Review. Japanese.
Cited by
-
Fish pathogen binding to mucins from Atlantic salmon and Arctic char differs in avidity and specificity and is modulated by fluid velocity.PLoS One. 2019 May 24;14(5):e0215583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215583. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31125340 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Enteromyxum leei (Myxozoa) infection on gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) (Teleostei) intestinal mucus: glycoprotein profile and bacterial adhesion.Parasitol Res. 2013 Feb;112(2):567-76. doi: 10.1007/s00436-012-3168-3. Epub 2012 Oct 20. Parasitol Res. 2013. PMID: 23086443
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources