Prospective randomized study comparing laparoscopic and open tension-free inguinal hernia repair with Shouldice's operation
- PMID: 9568665
- DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00004-x
Prospective randomized study comparing laparoscopic and open tension-free inguinal hernia repair with Shouldice's operation
Abstract
Background: Although tension-free techniques of hernia repair using synthetic meshes revealed encouraging results, the best method of inguinal hernia repair is still unclear.
Methods: In a prospective randomized phase-II-B study, early postoperative results of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair (n = 80), open plug and patch repair (n = 80), and Shouldice's operation (n = 80) were compared. Postoperative pain and patient's comfort were defined as main endpoints.
Results: The laparoscopic approach had significantly longer operation time and was more expensive (61 +/- 12 minutes; $1,211) than plug and patch repair (36 +/- 14 minutes; $124) and Shouldice's operation (47 +/- 17 minutes; $69). Main postoperative complications were wound hematomas, seromas, and superficial wound infection, without significant difference between the groups. Postoperative pain, analgesia requirements, limitation of daily activities, and return to work did not differ between laparoscopic and open tension-free repair but were significantly lower in both groups compared with Shouldice's operation. So far, no recurrence was observed after a mean follow-up of 25 months.
Conclusion: Open plug and patch repair is a promising technique of hernia repair in adults, because it offers the same excellent patient comfort as the laparoscopic repair but is less expensive and can be performed under local anesthesia.
Similar articles
-
Randomized controlled study of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal versus open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.Surg Endosc. 2003 Jun;17(6):850-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8575-6. Epub 2003 Mar 28. Surg Endosc. 2003. PMID: 12658428 Clinical Trial.
-
First Hungarian, internet-based prospective, multicenter study: the hernia-project.Acta Chir Hung. 1999;38(2):219-20. Acta Chir Hung. 1999. PMID: 10596334 Clinical Trial.
-
Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: outcome and cost.BMJ. 1998 Jul 11;317(7151):103-10. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7151.103. BMJ. 1998. PMID: 9657784 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Inguinal hernia: an old condition with new solutions.Ann Surg. 2003 Dec;238(6 Suppl):S148-57. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000097796.63010.e8. Ann Surg. 2003. PMID: 14703756 Review.
-
Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.Surg Clin North Am. 2008 Feb;88(1):157-78, x. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2007.10.005. Surg Clin North Am. 2008. PMID: 18267168 Review.
Cited by
-
Local and general anesthesia in the laparoscopic preperitoneal hernia repair.JSLS. 2000 Jul-Sep;4(3):221-4. JSLS. 2000. PMID: 10987398 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Prosthetic repair of incarcerated inguinal hernias: is it a reliable method?Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010 Jun;395(5):575-9. doi: 10.1007/s00423-008-0326-2. Epub 2008 May 27. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010. PMID: 18504602
-
Prosthetic Mesh Repair for Incarcerated Inguinal Hernia.Balkan Med J. 2016 Jul;33(4):434-40. doi: 10.5152/balkanmedj.2016.150137. Epub 2016 Jul 1. Balkan Med J. 2016. PMID: 27606140 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic vs conventional tension free inguinal herniorrhaphy: 2005 society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) annual meeting debate.Surg Endosc. 2006 Dec;20(12):1809-16. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-0073-9. Surg Endosc. 2006. PMID: 17024526 Review.
-
SAGES Appropriateness Conference: a summary.Surg Endosc. 2003 Nov;17(11):1729-34. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8125-x. Epub 2003 Sep 29. Surg Endosc. 2003. PMID: 14508670 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources