Large-scale human exposures to rabid or presumed rabid animals in the United States: 22 cases (1990-1996)
- PMID: 9569151
Large-scale human exposures to rabid or presumed rabid animals in the United States: 22 cases (1990-1996)
Abstract
Objective: To identify common elements of large-scale human exposures to rabid or presumed rabid animals in the United States from 1990 to 1996.
Design: Retrospective study.
Procedure: Health departments in 50 states and the District of Columbia were contacted regarding episodes of large-scale human exposures to rabid animals occurring between 1990 and 1996. A large-scale exposure was defined as administration of postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) to 25 or more people after an exposure to a rabid or presumed rabid animal or littermates. Incident-specific information was obtained through questionnaires sent to states reporting episodes. Data are reported as medians.
Results: Fifteen of 51 (29.4%) health departments reported 22 episodes; 72.7% involved companion animals or livestock. Twenty-six animals were involved in these 22 episodes, including 10 (38.5%) dogs, 4 (15.4%) livestock, 4 (15.4%) raccoons, 3 (11.5%) cats, 3 (11.5%) bats, and 2 (7.7%) ferrets. Schools (36.4%) and public places (22.7%) were the most common settings for exposures. Reportedly, 1,908 people received PEP. The cost for 10 episodes was $61,547/episode (range, $14,199 to $1,500,000). An episode-specific written algorithm for recommending PEP had been developed for use in only 4 (18.2%) episodes.
Clinical implications: Large-scale exposures most commonly involved a single companion animal. Exposures attributable to improper handling of wildlife and unrestricted access of animals in schools and public areas can be potentially remedied by targeted education. Use of an episode-specific algorithm to determine need for PEP may also reduce the number of unnecessary treatments.
Similar articles
-
Rabies surveillance in the United States during 2006.J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2007 Aug 15;231(4):540-56. doi: 10.2460/javma.231.4.540. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2007. PMID: 17696853
-
Rabies surveillance in the United States during 2009.J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2010 Sep 15;237(6):646-57. doi: 10.2460/javma.237.6.646. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2010. PMID: 20839985
-
Epidemiologic factors, clinical findings, and vaccination status of rabies in cats and dogs in the United States in 1988. National Study Group on Rabies.J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1990 Jul 15;197(2):201-9. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1990. PMID: 2384321
-
Rabies surveillance in the United States during 1996.J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1997 Dec 15;211(12):1525-39. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1997. PMID: 9412679 Review.
-
Oral vaccination of wildlife against rabies: opportunities and challenges in prevention and control.Dev Biol (Basel). 2004;119:173-84. Dev Biol (Basel). 2004. PMID: 15742629 Review.
Cited by
-
Rabies in Cats-An Emerging Public Health Issue.Viruses. 2024 Oct 19;16(10):1635. doi: 10.3390/v16101635. Viruses. 2024. PMID: 39459967 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Healthy animals, healthy people: zoonosis risk from animal contact in pet shops, a systematic review of the literature.PLoS One. 2014 Feb 26;9(2):e89309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089309. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24586679 Free PMC article.
-
Reemergence of rabies in Chhukha district, Bhutan, 2008.Emerg Infect Dis. 2010 Dec;16(12):1925-30. doi: 10.3201/eid1612.100958. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010. PMID: 21122223 Free PMC article.
-
Horses and the risk of zoonotic infections.Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 2004 Dec;20(3):643-53. doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2004.07.003. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 2004. PMID: 15519824 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Miscellaneous