Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1998 May;91(5 Pt 1):750-6.
doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00062-3.

Routine ultrasound screening in pregnancy and the children's subsequent neurologic development

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Routine ultrasound screening in pregnancy and the children's subsequent neurologic development

H Kieler et al. Obstet Gynecol. 1998 May.

Abstract

Objective: To test the null hypothesis of no association between ultrasound exposure in early fetal life and impaired neurologic development in childhood.

Methods: Study of children age 8-9 years whose mothers participated in a randomized controlled trial of ultrasound screening during pregnancy in Sweden during 1985-1987. Of 4637 eligible singletons, 3265 (70%) were studied through a questionnaire to their mothers. Assessment of neurologic development was based on parents' report of their child's speech and motor development. Behavioral disorders were assessed by a ten-item parent scale. Analyses were performed according to both assignment and ultrasound exposure. With a sample size of 1600 children in each group, a two-sided alpha of .05 and beta of .10, a risk ratio of less than 1.4 for the studied variables could not be detected.

Results: Delayed speech development was reported by 2.9% in the screening group compared with 2.4% in the nonscreening group (odds ratio [OR] 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79, 1.88). Similar prevalences were found when analysis was according to ultrasound exposure (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.78, 1.83). Delayed motor development was reported by 7.6% in the screening group compared with 7.2% in the nonscreening group (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.81, 1.37). Corresponding figures for ultrasound-exposed and -unexposed were 7.7% and 7.2%, respectively (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.83, 1.40). There also were no significant differences in behavioral disorders between screened and unscreened children or between exposed and unexposed children, respectively, according to parents' ratings.

Conclusion: No significant difference in impaired neurologic development between ultrasound-exposed and -unexposed children was found in this study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources