Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1998 Jan;28(1):29-38.
doi: 10.1023/a:1021404714631.

Effect of within-strain sample size on QTL detection and mapping using recombinant inbred mouse strains

Affiliations

Effect of within-strain sample size on QTL detection and mapping using recombinant inbred mouse strains

J K Belknap. Behav Genet. 1998 Jan.

Abstract

Increasing the number of mice used to calculate recombinant inbred (RI) strain means increases the accuracy of determining the phenotype associated with each genotype (strain), which in turn enhances quantitative trait locus (QTL) detection and mapping. The purpose of this paper is to examine quantitatively the effect of within-strain sample size (n) on additive QTL mapping efficiency and to make comparisons with F2 and backcross (BC) populations where each genotype is represented by only a single mouse. When 25 RI strains are used, the estimated equivalent number of F2 mice yielding the same power to detect WTLs varies inversely as a function of the heritability of the trait in the RI population (hRI2). For example, testing 25 strains with n = 10 per strain is approximately equivalent to 160 F2 mice when hRI2 = 0.2, but only 55 when hRI2 = 0.6. While increasing n is always beneficial, the gain in power as n increases is greatest when hRI2 is low and is much diminished at high hRI2 values. Thus, hRI2 is high, there is little advantage of large n, even when n approaches infinity. A cost analysis suggested that RI populations are more cost-effective than conventional selectively genotyped F2 populations at hRI2 values likely to be seen in behavioral studies. However, with DNA pooling, this advantage is greatly reduced and may be reversed depending on the values of hRI2 and n.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources