Functional appliance therapy with the Bionator
- PMID: 9573873
- DOI: 10.1016/s1073-8746(98)80040-6
Functional appliance therapy with the Bionator
Abstract
Since the early 20th century, functional appliance therapy has been a significant part of orthodontic treatment, especially in Europe, where functional appliances have been used to treat many malocclusions, including some skeletal discrepancies. Although the success of functional appliance therapy as reported in numerous short-term studies from 1930 to 1975 led to an euphoric acceptance of this method, the few long-term studies, especially those comparing treated with untreated homogeneous control groups, indicated that the specific skeletal and dentoalveolar effects depended on the individual growth period and pattern of the patient. In this article, a specific functional appliance, the Bionator, is presented. Long-term follow-up studies provide indications for its use. At the present time, functional orthopedic appliance therapy has a more limited but well-defined place in our therapeutic approach. The type and character of the malocclusion determines the indications and contraindications of the functional appliance. Scientific and clinical experience has shown the importance of a differential diagnosis for each patient, which integrates etiology and morphogenesis in the individual treatment objectives for special skeletal, dentoalveolar, and functional regions. Individualization in the construction of the appliance, taking the above-mentioned factors into consideration, is essential for optimal clinical results.
Similar articles
-
A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part I--The hard tissues.Eur J Orthod. 1998 Oct;20(5):501-16. doi: 10.1093/ejo/20.5.501. Eur J Orthod. 1998. PMID: 9825553 Clinical Trial.
-
Treatment effects produced by the Bionator appliance. Comparison with an untreated Class II sample.Eur J Orthod. 2004 Feb;26(1):65-72. doi: 10.1093/ejo/26.1.65. Eur J Orthod. 2004. PMID: 14994884
-
Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Dec;134(6):732-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.07.022. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008. PMID: 19061799
-
[Bionator basic functional appliance].Orthod Epitheor. 1989 Sep;1(3):147-52. Orthod Epitheor. 1989. PMID: 2486315 Review. Greek, Modern.
-
Bone Remodeling in Adults: Treatment of an Adult Skeletal Class II, Division 2 Patient Using a Modified Bionator II Appliance.Int J Orthod Milwaukee. 2016 Autumn;27(3):19-26. Int J Orthod Milwaukee. 2016. PMID: 30178937 Review.
Cited by
-
Morphometric analysis of long-term dentoskeletal effects induced by treatment with Balters bionator.Angle Orthod. 2015 Sep;85(5):790-8. doi: 10.2319/080714-554.1. Epub 2014 Dec 3. Angle Orthod. 2015. PMID: 25469744 Free PMC article.
-
Changes in soft-tissue profiles after treatment of class II/1 patients with bite-jumping appliances.J Orofac Orthop. 2013 Mar;74(2):113-23. doi: 10.1007/s00056-012-0128-6. Epub 2013 Mar 7. J Orofac Orthop. 2013. PMID: 23463301 Clinical Trial.
-
Twenty-year follow-up of functional treatment with a bionator appliance: A retrospective dental cast analysis.Angle Orthod. 2020 Mar;90(2):209-215. doi: 10.2319/042419-292.1. Epub 2019 Sep 4. Angle Orthod. 2020. PMID: 31483143 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term (≥ 15 years) outcome quality after Class II:1 bionator or Herbst multibracket appliance treatment : A comparison.J Orofac Orthop. 2024 Jul;85(4):260-269. doi: 10.1007/s00056-023-00457-3. Epub 2023 Feb 24. J Orofac Orthop. 2024. PMID: 36826527 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of bionator therapy for Class II malocclusions: a comparative long-term study.J Orofac Orthop. 2012 Apr;73(2):91-103. doi: 10.1007/s00056-011-0066-8. Epub 2012 Mar 7. J Orofac Orthop. 2012. PMID: 22391786 English, German.