Subtotal colectomy vs. intraoperative colonic irrigation in the management of obstructed left colon carcinoma

Abstract

Purpose: Whether primary anastomosis should be performed after segmental resection with intraoperative colonic irrigation or subtotal colectomy is not yet established in the surgical treatment of obstructive left colon carcinoma. In this prospective, nonrandomized study, we present the results of 66 patients undergoing one-stage surgery for obstructed left colon carcinoma.

Patients and methods: We compared two techniques, subtotal colectomy (35 patients) and intraoperative colonic irrigation with segmental resection and immediate anastomosis (31 patients).

Results: The mortality rate was similar in both groups, 8.5 percent in the subtotal colectomy group and 3.2 percent in the intraoperative colonic irrigation group. The surgical complication rate was significantly higher in the intraoperative colonic irrigation group (41.9 percent) than in the subtotal colectomy group (14.2 percent; P < 0.05). Mean operating time was significantly lower in the subtotal colectomy group than in the intraoperative colonic irrigation group (P < 0.05). Both groups had a similar mean duration of hospital stay. Ten patients who underwent subtotal colectomy (31.2 percent) presented with diarrhea in the immediate postoperative period, which disappeared spontaneously or with antidiarrheal medication; a disabling diarrhea persisted in two patients only (6.2 percent).

Conclusion: We believe that subtotal colectomy is the treatment of choice for obstructed left-sided colonic carcinoma. Segmental resection with intraoperative colonic irrigation is more appropriate than subtotal colectomy only in patients with carcinomas of the rectosigmoid junction or with previous anal incontinence to avoid the appearance of postoperative diarrhea.