Clinical experience with primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty compared with alteplase (recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator) in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a report from the Second National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI-2)
- PMID: 9581714
- DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00094-1
Clinical experience with primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty compared with alteplase (recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator) in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a report from the Second National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI-2)
Abstract
Objectives: We sought to compare outcomes after primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction (MI).
Background: Primary PTCA and thrombolytic therapy are alternative means of achieving reperfusion in patients with acute MI. The Second National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI-2) offers an opportunity to study the clinical experience with these modalities in a large patient group.
Methods: Data from NRMI-2 were reviewed.
Results: From June 1, 1994 through October 31, 1995, 4,939 nontransfer patients underwent primary PTCA within 12 h of symptom onset, and 24,705 patients received alteplase (recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator [rt-PA]). When lytic-ineligible patients and patients presenting in cardiogenic shock were excluded, baseline characteristics were similar. The median time from presentation to initiation of rt-PA in the thrombolytic group was 42 min; the median time to first balloon inflation in the primary PTCA group was 111 min (p < 0.0001). In-hospital mortality was higher in patients in shock after rt-PA than after PTCA (52% vs. 32%, p < 0.0001). In-hospital mortality was the same in lytic-eligible patients not in shock: 5.4% after rt-PA and 5.2% after PTCA. The stroke rate was higher after lytic therapy (1.6% vs. 0.7% after PTCA, p < 0.0001), but the combined end point of death and nonfatal stroke was not significantly different between the two groups (6.2% after rt-PA and 5.6% after PTCA). There was no difference in the rate of reinfarction (2.9% after rt-PA and 2.5% after PTCA).
Conclusions: These findings suggest that in lytic-eligible patients not in shock, PTCA and rt-PA are comparable alternative methods of reperfusion when analyzed in terms of in-hospital mortality, mortality plus nonfatal stroke and reinfarction.
Similar articles
-
Reperfusion therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction and prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-2).Am J Cardiol. 1999 Dec 1;84(11):1287-91. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00559-7. Am J Cardiol. 1999. PMID: 10614792 Clinical Trial.
-
Analysis of the relative costs and effectiveness of primary angioplasty versus tissue-type plasminogen activator: the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) trial. The PAMI Trial Investigators.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Apr;29(5):901-7. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00041-7. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997. PMID: 9120173 Clinical Trial.
-
Outcome of different reperfusion strategies in patients with former contraindications to thrombolytic therapy: a comparison of primary angioplasty and tissue plasminogen activator. Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) Investigators.Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1996 Dec;39(4):333-9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199612)39:4<333::AID-CCD1>3.0.CO;2-E. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1996. PMID: 8958418 Clinical Trial.
-
Alteplase: a pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its use in the management of myocardial infarction.Pharmacoeconomics. 1995 Nov;8(5):428-59. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199508050-00006. Pharmacoeconomics. 1995. PMID: 10172669 Review.
-
Thrombolysis and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction.Z Kardiol. 2000;89 Suppl 4:IV30-40. doi: 10.1007/s003920070061. Z Kardiol. 2000. PMID: 10810775 Review.
Cited by
-
Primary coronary intervention versus thrombolytic therapy in myocardial infarction patients in the Middle East.Int J Clin Pharm. 2012 Jun;34(3):445-51. doi: 10.1007/s11096-012-9627-1. Epub 2012 Apr 3. Int J Clin Pharm. 2012. PMID: 22477207
-
Use of reperfusion therapies in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction.Drugs Aging. 2001;18(8):587-96. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200118080-00003. Drugs Aging. 2001. PMID: 11587245 Review.
-
In-hospital mortality of elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction: data from the MITRA (Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction) registry.Clin Cardiol. 2000 Nov;23(11):831-6. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960231109. Clin Cardiol. 2000. PMID: 11097130 Free PMC article.
-
Time to treatment and cost of thrombolysis: a multicenter comparison of tPA and rPA.J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2000 Apr;9(3):303-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1018797411812. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2000. PMID: 10728031
-
Percutaneous coronary intervention in the elderly.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011 Feb;8(2):79-90. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2010.184. Epub 2010 Dec 7. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 21139558 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical