Prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity in a general dental population
- PMID: 9584750
Prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity in a general dental population
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine, by questionnaire, the reported levels of dentine hypersensitivity in adult patients attending general dental practice. A total of 250 subjects (88 males, aged 40 +/- 14.3 years; 162 females aged 37 +/- 11.6 years), were recruited to the study in 5 dental practices. The prevalence of reported sensitivity was 57.2%, most frequently occurring in the 30-39 year age group. In the vast majority of cases (89.3%) cold was the major stimulus for pain, other commonly reported causes being toothbrushing (38.6%), hot (37.9%) and sweet (25%) stimuli. Desensitising toothpastes were used by 67.9% of those reporting sensitivity, the majority of these (72.6%) reporting a beneficial effect. Professional treatment had been sought by 32% of subjects, almost all (91%) reporting an improvement post-treatment. There was no significant correlation in the level of reported sensitivity and previous periodontal treatment. The majority of subjects with sensitivity also smoked (67.6%), although this relationship did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.07). Visual analogue scales indicated that perceived pain levels with dentine sensitivity were relatively low. It was concluded that the prevalence of dentine sensitivity found in this study was much higher than previously reported, suggesting an increase in the levels of sensitivity within the general population.
Similar articles
-
An analysis of the aetiology, prevalence and clinical features of dentine hypersensitivity in a general dental population.Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012 Aug;16(8):1107-16. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012. PMID: 22913162
-
A pilot assessment of alternative methods of quantifying dental pain with particular reference to dentine hypersensitivity.Community Dent Health. 1997 Jun;14(2):92-6. Community Dent Health. 1997. PMID: 9225538
-
A cross-sectional study of dentine hypersensitivity in China.Int Dent J. 2009 Dec;59(6):376-80. Int Dent J. 2009. PMID: 20162951
-
Dentine hypersensitivity: its prevalence, aetiology and clinical management.Dent Update. 1992 Dec;19(10):407-8, 410-2. Dent Update. 1992. PMID: 1303354 Review.
-
[Dentin hypersensitivity and its significance in dental practice].Fogorv Sz. 2002 Dec;95(6):223-8. Fogorv Sz. 2002. PMID: 12629828 Review. Hungarian.
Cited by
-
Effect of surface pretreatment with two desensitizer techniques on the microleakage of resin composite restorations.Lasers Med Sci. 2013 Jan;28(1):247-51. doi: 10.1007/s10103-012-1128-x. Epub 2012 Jun 14. Lasers Med Sci. 2013. PMID: 22696076
-
Effect of tropical fruit juices on dentine permeability and erosive ability in removing the smear layer: An in vitro study.J Dent Sci. 2016 Jun;11(2):130-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2015.11.003. Epub 2016 Mar 29. J Dent Sci. 2016. PMID: 30894960 Free PMC article.
-
Observations on dentine hypersensitivity in general dental practices in the United Arab Emirates.Eur J Dent. 2013 Oct;7(4):389-394. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.120634. Eur J Dent. 2013. PMID: 24932110 Free PMC article.
-
Current diagnosis of dentin hypersensitivity in the dental office: an overview.Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Mar;17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S21-9. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0911-1. Epub 2013 Jan 8. Clin Oral Investig. 2013. PMID: 23296425 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity in general dental practices in the northwest United States.J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Mar;144(3):288-96. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0116. J Am Dent Assoc. 2013. PMID: 23449905 Free PMC article.