A multistakeholder-driven model for developing an outcome management system
- PMID: 9595879
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02287477
A multistakeholder-driven model for developing an outcome management system
Abstract
Increasing demands for accountability in the delivery of public mental health services are engendering organized systems of treatment outcome monitoring. As such systems are designed and implemented, it is critical that key stakeholders be involved to the greatest extent possible in developing assessment instruments and methodologies so as to ensure relevance and acceptability of the outcome management system. A multistakeholder-based initiative for developing standardized outcome assessment for public mental health services in Virginia is described. Key components of the initiative include the process by which stakeholders were enlisted, the identification of recommended assessment instruments, and a pilot project that began the evaluation of the feasibility, utility, and cost-benefit of using the instruments. To illustrate features of this initiative, the child/adolescent mental health pilot project is described in detail. Implications for behavioral health administrators and next steps for Virginia's outcome management system are discussed, highlighting the role of key stakeholders.
Similar articles
-
The ecology of outcomes: system accountability in children's mental health.J Behav Health Serv Res. 1998 May;25(2):136-50. doi: 10.1007/BF02287476. J Behav Health Serv Res. 1998. PMID: 9595878 Review.
-
The development of a statewide continuous evaluation system for the Texas Children's Mental Health Plan: a total quality management approach.J Behav Health Serv Res. 1998 May;25(2):194-207. doi: 10.1007/BF02287480. J Behav Health Serv Res. 1998. PMID: 9595882
-
Program specification: a precursor to program monitoring and quality improvement. A case study from Boysville of Michigan.J Behav Health Serv Res. 1998 May;25(2):208-16. doi: 10.1007/BF02287481. J Behav Health Serv Res. 1998. PMID: 9595883
-
Managing what you measure: creating outcome-driven systems of care for youth with serious emotional disturbances.J Behav Health Serv Res. 1998 May;25(2):177-93. doi: 10.1007/BF02287479. J Behav Health Serv Res. 1998. PMID: 9595881
-
Evaluating paediatric brain injury services in NSW.Child Care Health Dev. 2010 Jan;36(1):54-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.01005.x. Epub 2009 Nov 2. Child Care Health Dev. 2010. PMID: 19886908 Review.
Cited by
-
A feasibility study to assess service providers' perspectives regarding the use of the child and adolescent functional assessment scale in Ontario.J Behav Health Serv Res. 2005 Jan-Mar;32(1):105-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02287332. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2005. PMID: 15632802
-
Examining Outcomes of Acute Psychiatric Hospitalization among Children.Soc Work Ment Health. 2012;10(3):205-232. doi: 10.1080/15332985.2011.628602. Soc Work Ment Health. 2012. PMID: 23946699 Free PMC article.
-
Clinicians and outcome measurement: what's the use?J Behav Health Serv Res. 2003 Oct-Dec;30(4):393-405. doi: 10.1007/BF02287427. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2003. PMID: 14593663
-
Implementation support for the data-driven components of care in a multisite network of coordinated specialty care programs.Transl Behav Med. 2024 Mar 21;14(4):225-233. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibae011. Transl Behav Med. 2024. PMID: 38470183 Free PMC article.
-
Linking data to decision-making: applying qualitative data analysis methods and software to identify mechanisms for using outcomes data.J Behav Health Serv Res. 2007 Oct;34(4):459-74. doi: 10.1007/s11414-007-9064-4. Epub 2007 Jul 24. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2007. PMID: 17647110 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials