Managing what you measure: creating outcome-driven systems of care for youth with serious emotional disturbances
- PMID: 9595881
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02287479
Managing what you measure: creating outcome-driven systems of care for youth with serious emotional disturbances
Abstract
This article presents the California System of Care Model for youth with severe emotional disturbances as an illustration of how ongoing assessment of the costs and outcomes of service delivery can be an integral part of a service delivery model. The core of this model, developed initially in Ventura County, California, is a five-step planning process that guides care system development and implementation. The implications of each stage of the planning process for evaluation and feedback at the child, family, and system levels are highlighted. A set of principles for selecting outcome measures deriving from the planning process are also presented that, in conjunction with the planning model, serve as guidelines for establishing outcome measures within care systems. The resulting specific plan for measuring system- and client-level outcomes deriving from this process, along with challenges to the implementation of the outcome management plan, is described.
Similar articles
-
The ecology of outcomes: system accountability in children's mental health.J Behav Health Serv Res. 1998 May;25(2):136-50. doi: 10.1007/BF02287476. J Behav Health Serv Res. 1998. PMID: 9595878 Review.
-
Managing care across systems to improve outcomes for families and communities.J Behav Health Serv Res. 1998 May;25(2):217-29. doi: 10.1007/BF02287482. J Behav Health Serv Res. 1998. PMID: 9595884
-
The development of a statewide continuous evaluation system for the Texas Children's Mental Health Plan: a total quality management approach.J Behav Health Serv Res. 1998 May;25(2):194-207. doi: 10.1007/BF02287480. J Behav Health Serv Res. 1998. PMID: 9595882
-
Program specification: a precursor to program monitoring and quality improvement. A case study from Boysville of Michigan.J Behav Health Serv Res. 1998 May;25(2):208-16. doi: 10.1007/BF02287481. J Behav Health Serv Res. 1998. PMID: 9595883
-
A focused strategic plan for outcomes evaluation.Nurs Clin North Am. 1997 Sep;32(3):615-31. Nurs Clin North Am. 1997. PMID: 9254644 Review.
Cited by
-
The Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS): review and current status.Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2001 Mar;4(1):63-84. doi: 10.1023/a:1009528727345. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2001. PMID: 11388564
-
Performance measurement in healthcare: part I--concepts and trends from a State of the Science Review.Healthc Policy. 2006 May;1(4):85-104. Healthc Policy. 2006. PMID: 19305684 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the effectiveness of care for youth with severe emotional disturbances: is there agreement between popular outcome measures?J Behav Health Serv Res. 2002 Aug;29(3):259-73. doi: 10.1007/BF02287367. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2002. PMID: 12216371
-
Development of a measure to assess the implementation of children's systems of care: the Systems of Care Implementation Survey (SOCIS).J Behav Health Serv Res. 2011 Jul;38(3):288-302. doi: 10.1007/s11414-011-9239-x. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2011. PMID: 21590313
-
Determinates of youth and parent satisfaction in usual care psychotherapy.Eval Program Plann. 2007 Feb;30(1):45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2006.10.003. Epub 2006 Dec 19. Eval Program Plann. 2007. PMID: 17689312 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical