Importance of initial environments in the development of ambulatory sensitization to methamphetamine and cocaine in mice
- PMID: 9600723
- DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1998.tb06865.x
Importance of initial environments in the development of ambulatory sensitization to methamphetamine and cocaine in mice
Abstract
Repeated administration of CNS stimulants such as amphetamines and cocaine induces behavioural sensitization which can be influenced by the animal's environment. This study has evaluated the effect of restraint on the development and maintenance of ambulatory sensitization to methamphetamine and cocaine in mice. Subcutaneous administration of the CNS stimulants methamphetamine (2 mg kg(-1)) and cocaine (20 mg kg(-1)) seven times at three-day intervals resulted in ambulatory sensitization when the mice were placed in 20-cm diameter activity cages after each dose of the drug. However, if methamphetamine or cocaine was administered when the mice were in small jars (6-cm diameter) in which expression of ambulation, but not of circling and rearing, was completely restricted, the development of ambulatory sensitization was retarded or inhibited, with circling behaviour concurrently increased, when subsequent repeated doses of the drug were administered in the activity cage. Subsequent repeated treatment of ambulatory-sensitized mice with the drug or saline when the mice were in the jars did not change the levels of the ambulatory sensitization or the circling behaviour. These results suggest that the mice are sensitized to the behavioural effect of CNS stimulants which can be expressed in the environment in which the drug is administered. It is also considered that the established sensitization is strongly retained and is responsible for retardation or suppression of the development of sensitization to other behavioural stimulant effects.
Similar articles
-
Effects of interdose interval on ambulatory sensitization to methamphetamine, cocaine and morphine in mice.Eur J Pharmacol. 1996 Nov 28;316(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(96)00635-8. Eur J Pharmacol. 1996. PMID: 8982642
-
Inhibitory effect of restraint on induction of behavioral sensitization to methamphetamine and cocaine in mice.Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1996 Jun;54(2):327-31. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(95)02026-8. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1996. PMID: 8743591
-
Importance of post-drug environmental factors for induction of sensitization to the ambulation-increasing effects of methamphetamine and cocaine in mice.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1996 Aug;126(4):293-300. doi: 10.1007/BF02247380. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1996. PMID: 8878345
-
Comparison of cocaine- and methamphetamine-evoked dopamine and glutamate overflow in somatodendritic and terminal field regions of the rat brain during acute, chronic, and early withdrawal conditions.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001 Jun;937:93-120. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb03560.x. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001. PMID: 11458542 Review.
-
Norepinephrine and stimulant addiction.Addict Biol. 2009 Apr;14(2):119-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2008.00138.x. Epub 2008 Sep 22. Addict Biol. 2009. PMID: 18811678 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Selective breeding for magnitude of methamphetamine-induced sensitization alters methamphetamine consumption.Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011 Apr;214(4):791-804. doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-2086-2. Epub 2010 Nov 19. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011. PMID: 21088960 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical