Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1998 May;15(5):310-3.
doi: 10.1023/a:1022552713015.

FISH preimplantation diagnosis of chromosome aneuploidy in recurrent pregnancy wastage

Affiliations

FISH preimplantation diagnosis of chromosome aneuploidy in recurrent pregnancy wastage

F Vidal et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998 May.

Abstract

Purpose: Our purpose was to detect aneuploidy for chromosomes 13, 16, 18, 21, 22, X, and Y in preimplantation embryos from patients with a history of unexplained recurrent miscarriage.

Methods: Three patients with a history of unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion were included in this study. Embryos were biopsied at the eight-cell stage, individually fixed on slides, and processed for fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). A multiple FISH protocol for seven chromosomes pairs (13, 16, 18, 21, 22, X, and Y) has been developed.

Results: A total of 39 embryos was studied with the multiple FISH protocol developed. Successful analysis of the biopsied embryos was achieved within the time limits usually allowed in a preimplantation diagnosis program. Analysis of the blastomeres showed that 17 embryos were chromosomally normal for the probes used, 16 embryos were aneuploid, and in 6 embryos no informative results were obtained.

Conclusions: In the patients studied, a large proportion of embryos (41%) exhibited chromosomal abnormalities for the probes used. Preimplantation diagnosis to screen for chromosome abnormalities could be a feasible approach to improve the possibility of successful pregnancy in these couples.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stirrat G. Recurrent miscarriage I. Definition and epidemiology. Lancet. 1990;336:673–675. - PubMed
    1. Berry CW, Brambati B, Eskes TKAB, Exalto N, Fox H, Geraedts JPM, Gerhart I, Gonzales Gomes F, Grudzinskas JG, Hustin J, Jouppila P, Lindblom M. M., Montenegro N, Nogales Fernandes F, O'Rahilly R, Pedersen JF, Peters PWJ, Regan L, Rushton DI, van Straaten HWM, Tarlatzis BC, Wells M. The Euro-team early pregnancy (ETEP) protocol for recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1516–1520. - PubMed
    1. Simón C, Gutierrez A, Vidal A, de los Santos MJ, Tarín JJ, Remohí J, Pellicer A. Outcome of patients with endometriosis in assisted reproduction: Results from in vitro fertilization and oocyte donation. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:725–729. - PubMed
    1. Balasch J, Creus M, Fábregues F, Cívico S, Carmona F, Martorell J, Vanrell JA. In vitro fertilization treatment for unexplained recurrent abortion: A pilot study. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1579–1582. - PubMed
    1. Hassold T. Chromosome abnormalities in human reproductive wastage. Trends Genet. 1978;2:105–110.

Publication types