Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1998 Jun;170(6):1609-11.
doi: 10.2214/ajr.170.6.9609182.

Peripherally inserted central venous catheters: factors affecting patient satisfaction

Affiliations

Peripherally inserted central venous catheters: factors affecting patient satisfaction

J F Polak et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: We studied factors that affect satisfaction of patients who have undergone placement of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) by interventional radiologists and patients' willingness to undergo placement of future PICCs.

Subjects and methods: This longitudinal prospective consecutive cohort study included 85 patients referred for PICC placement. A record was made of catheter type, time taken for placement, patient age, and possible complications. Follow-up was obtained by telephone interview to determine the effect of site of placement in the arm, residence time of catheter, additional complications, and interference with activities of daily living on patient willingness to undergo future PICC placement at the same site. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors statistically predictive of patient willingness to undergo placement of future PICCs.

Results: Patients having PICCs placed above the elbow were more often satisfied (55 of 61 respondents) with catheter location than patients having placements at the elbow (three of 17 respondents). Patient willingness to undergo future PICC placement was strongly related to catheter location (p < .0001) and interference with activities of daily living (p < .0001). Catheter type, residence time, time taken for the placement, age, and complications were not associated with patient willingness to undergo future PICC placement.

Conclusion: PICC placement above the elbow is more acceptable to patients than placement at the elbow. PICC placement above the elbow and patients' perception of less interference by the PICC with activities of daily living are positively related to patient willingness to undergo future PICC placement.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources