The Ipswich Childbirth Study: 1. A randomised evaluation of two stage postpartum perineal repair leaving the skin unsutured
- PMID: 9609272
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10130.x
The Ipswich Childbirth Study: 1. A randomised evaluation of two stage postpartum perineal repair leaving the skin unsutured
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate a policy of two stage postpartum perineal repair leaving the skin unsutured.
Design: A stratified randomised controlled trial using a 2 x 2 factorial design.
Setting: The maternity unit at Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust, a district general hospital, between 1992 and 1994.
Sample: 1780 women requiring surgical repair of episiotomy or first or second degree tear following a spontaneous or simple instrumental delivery.
Methods: A policy of two-stage perineal repair leaving skin unsutured was compared with a policy of three stage repair including skin closure with interrupted or subcuticular sutures. Both groups were assessed by a research midwife, blind to the allocation, completing questionnaires at 24 to 48 hours and 10 days postpartum, and by self-completed questionnaires at three months after birth.
Main outcome measures: 1. 24 to 48 hours postpartum: perineal pain; healing; 2. 10 days postpartum: perineal pain, healing and removal of sutures; 3. three months postpartum: perineal pain, removal of sutures, resuturing, dyspareunia, and failure to resume pain-free intercourse.
Results: Completed questionnaires were returned for 99% of women at both 24 to 48 hours and ten days and by 93% of women three months postpartum. No differences were detected in perineal pain at 24 to 48 hours (62% vs 64%; RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.90-1.03; 2P = 0.3) and 10 days (25% vs 28%; RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.77-1.06; 2P = 0.2). Significantly fewer women allocated to two-stage repair reported tight stitches at ten days (14% vs 18%; RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.96, 2P = 0.02); similar numbers of repairs were judged to be breaking down (five compared with seven women). At three months postpartum fewer women allocated to the two-stage repair reported perineal pain and more had resumed pain-free intercourse. Amongst women who had resumed intercourse there was a significant difference in dyspareunia (15% vs 19%; RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.65-0.99; 2P = 0.04). Significantly fewer women in the two-stage repair group (7% vs 12%; RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45-0.83; 2P = < 0.01) reported removal of suture material. Four women in the two-stage repair group had required resuturing, compared with nine allocated to the three-stage repair.
Conclusions: Two-stage repair of perineal trauma leaving the skin unsutured appears to reduce pain and dyspareunia three months postpartum. There are no apparent disadvantages, in particular no evidence of an increased risk of breakdown of the repair and resuturing.
Comment in
-
The Ipswich Childbirth Study: 1. A randomised evaluation of two stage postpartum perineal repair leaving the skin unsutured.Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Jan;106(1):89-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08098.x. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999. PMID: 10426270 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The Ipswich Childbirth Study: 2. A randomised comparison of polyglactin 910 with chromic catgut for postpartum perineal repair.Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Apr;105(4):441-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10131.x. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998. PMID: 9609273 Clinical Trial.
-
The Ipswich childbirth study: one year follow up of alternative methods used in perineal repair.BJOG. 2001 Jan;108(1):34-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00016.x. BJOG. 2001. PMID: 11213002 Clinical Trial.
-
Postpartum perineal repair performed by midwives: a randomised trial comparing two suture techniques leaving the skin unsutured.BJOG. 2008 Mar;115(4):472-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01637.x. BJOG. 2008. PMID: 18271883 Clinical Trial.
-
[Perineal tears and episiotomy: Surgical procedure - CNGOF perineal prevention and protection in obstetrics guidelines].Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018 Dec;46(12):948-967. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.10.024. Epub 2018 Nov 2. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018. PMID: 30392991 Review. French.
-
Preventing perineal trauma during childbirth: a systematic review.Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Mar;95(3):464-71. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00560-8. Obstet Gynecol. 2000. PMID: 10711565
Cited by
-
Perineal care.BMJ Clin Evid. 2011 Apr 11;2011:1401. BMJ Clin Evid. 2011. PMID: 21481287 Free PMC article.
-
Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation.Lancet. 2009 Sep 26;374(9695):1097-104. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61086-2. Lancet. 2009. PMID: 19782875 Free PMC article.
-
Perineal care.BMJ Clin Evid. 2008 Sep 24;2008:1401. BMJ Clin Evid. 2008. PMID: 19445799 Free PMC article.
-
Postpartum perineal pain in a low episiotomy setting: association with severity of genital trauma, labor care, and birth variables.Birth. 2009 Dec;36(4):283-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00355.x. Birth. 2009. PMID: 20002420 Free PMC article.
-
Perineal care.BMJ Clin Evid. 2015 Mar 10;2015:1401. BMJ Clin Evid. 2015. PMID: 25752310 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical