The Ipswich Childbirth Study: 2. A randomised comparison of polyglactin 910 with chromic catgut for postpartum perineal repair
- PMID: 9609273
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10131.x
The Ipswich Childbirth Study: 2. A randomised comparison of polyglactin 910 with chromic catgut for postpartum perineal repair
Abstract
Objective: To compare polyglactin 910 sutures with chromic catgut sutures for postpartum perineal repair.
Design: A stratified randomised controlled trial, using a 2 x 2 factorial design.
Setting: The maternity unit at Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust, a district general hospital, between 1992 and 1994.
Sample: 1780 women who had sustained an episiotomy or first or second degree tear following a spontaneous or simple instrumental delivery.
Methods: Policies of repair with polyglactin 910 or chromic catgut were compared. Both groups were assessed by a research midwife completing questionnaires at 24 to 48 hours and at ten days postpartum, and by self-completed questionnaires at three months after birth.
Main outcome measures: 1. 24 to 48 hours postpartum: perineal pain, healing; 2. ten days postpartum: perineal pain, healing and removal of sutures; 3. three months postpartum: perineal pain, removal of sutures, resuturing, dyspareunia, and failure to resume pain-free intercourse.
Results: Completed questionnaires were returned for 99% of women at both 24 to 48 hours and ten days and by 93% of women three months postpartum. The two groups were similar at trial entry. Significantly fewer women allocated to the polyglactin 910 reported pain in the previous 24 hours at both 24 to 48 hours (59% vs 67%; RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.83-0.95; 2P < 0.01), and ten days (24% vs 29%; RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.69-0.95; 2P = 0.01). At three months postpartum there was no clear difference between the groups in terms of perineal pain, dyspareunia or failure to resume pain-free intercourse. More women in the polyglactin 910 group reported that some suture material had been removed (12% vs 7%; RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.19-2.21; 2P < 0.01). Three women in the polyglactin 910 group had required resuturing compared with ten in the chromic catgut group (RR 0.30; 95% CI 0.08-1.09; 2P = 0.1).
Conclusions: Using polyglactin 910 rather than chromic catgut for perineal repair leads to about one fewer women among every 20 having perineal pain and using analgesia ten days postpartum. Its only apparent disadvantage is that more women, again estimated as 1 in 20, report having material removed during healing. Data from this and other trials suggest that for every 100 women repaired with a polyglycolic acid-based material, about one fewer will require resuturing.
Similar articles
-
Absorbable synthetic versus catgut suture material for perineal repair.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000006. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jun 16;(6):CD000006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000006.pub2. PMID: 10796081 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
The Ipswich Childbirth Study: 1. A randomised evaluation of two stage postpartum perineal repair leaving the skin unsutured.Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Apr;105(4):435-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10130.x. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998. PMID: 9609272 Clinical Trial.
-
The Ipswich childbirth study: one year follow up of alternative methods used in perineal repair.BJOG. 2001 Jan;108(1):34-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00016.x. BJOG. 2001. PMID: 11213002 Clinical Trial.
-
Impact of chromic catgut versus polyglactin 910 versus fast-absorbing polyglactin 910 sutures for perineal repair: a randomized, controlled trial.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jun;194(6):1585-90; discussion 1590. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.011. Epub 2006 Apr 21. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006. PMID: 16731075 Clinical Trial.
-
[Perineal tears and episiotomy: Surgical procedure - CNGOF perineal prevention and protection in obstetrics guidelines].Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018 Dec;46(12):948-967. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.10.024. Epub 2018 Nov 2. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018. PMID: 30392991 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Absorbable suture materials for primary repair of episiotomy and second degree tears.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jun 16;2010(6):CD000006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000006.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010. PMID: 20556745 Free PMC article.
-
Postpartum perineal pain in a low episiotomy setting: association with severity of genital trauma, labor care, and birth variables.Birth. 2009 Dec;36(4):283-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00355.x. Birth. 2009. PMID: 20002420 Free PMC article.
-
Perineal care.BMJ Clin Evid. 2008 Sep 24;2008:1401. BMJ Clin Evid. 2008. PMID: 19445799 Free PMC article.
-
Features of randomised trials designed by the NPEU Perinatal Trials Service during Adrian Grant's directorship.Reprod Health. 2018 Jul 9;15(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0567-7. Reprod Health. 2018. PMID: 29986758 Free PMC article.
-
Absorbable synthetic versus catgut suture material for perineal repair.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000006. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jun 16;(6):CD000006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000006.pub2. PMID: 10796081 Free PMC article. Updated.