Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1998 May;178(5):982-6.
doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70535-6.

A longitudinal study of human papillomavirus carriage in human immunodeficiency virus-infected and human immunodeficiency virus-uninfected women

Affiliations

A longitudinal study of human papillomavirus carriage in human immunodeficiency virus-infected and human immunodeficiency virus-uninfected women

H Minkoff et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 May.

Abstract

Objective: We sought to determine the relationship of human immunodeficiency virus serostatus to carriage of oncogenic human papillomavirus.

Material and methods: A total of 268 human immunodeficiency virus-infected and 265 human immunodeficiency virus-uninfected women were seen every 6 months, at which time they had laboratory tests performed including a CD4 count. Human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid was analyzed by polymerase chain reaction. Statistical methods included Kaplan-Meier and Cox's proportional hazard models.

Results: The prevalence at baseline of any human papillomavirus type was 73% and 43% among human immunodeficiency virus-seropositive and seronegative women, respectively (p < 0.0001) and of oncogenic types was 32.5% and 17.0% (p < 0.001). The prevalence of oncogenic human papillomavirus was higher in women with CD4 counts <200 mm3 (p < 0.001). The rate of detection of new oncogenic human papillomavirus per 100 patient years of follow-up in human immunodeficiency virus-seropositive women was almost three times higher than among human immunodeficiency virus-seronegative women (p < 0.01). The rate of loss of an oncogenic human papillomavirus was higher in the human immunodeficiency virus-seronegative women but the difference was not significant. The relative risk of a human immunodeficiency virus-infected woman who did not initially have a specific type of oncogenic human papillomavirus having one detected during follow-up was 6.6 times greater than among human immunodeficiency virus-negative women (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Human immunodeficiency virus-seropositive women are more likely to have newly detectable oncogenic types of human papillomavirus at follow-up and to show persistent carriage of oncogenic types of human papillomavirus types. Among human immunodeficiency virus-infected women, those with higher CD4 counts were more likely to have a newly detected oncogenic human papillomavirus during follow-up.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by