Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1998 May;39(5):180-2.

Oral magnesium for tocolysis: a comparison of magnesium gluconate and enteric-coated magnesium chloride

Affiliations
  • PMID: 9610075
Clinical Trial

Oral magnesium for tocolysis: a comparison of magnesium gluconate and enteric-coated magnesium chloride

R W Martin et al. J Miss State Med Assoc. 1998 May.

Abstract

Purpose: Following parenteral magnesium tocolysis for patients in preterm labor. The choice of oral tocolytic medications is controversial.

Methods: Over a six-month period, 47 patients who were inpreterm labor were randomized after parenteral magnesium tocolysis to receive magnesium gluconate ([Mg-g] 648 mg elemental magnesium/day) or magnesium chloride ([Mg-c] 640 mg elemental magnesium/ day). A serum magnesium was obtained 24 hours after the initiation of oral therapy.

Results: In the 25 patients were treated with Mg-g and 22 with Mg-c there were no differences in patient demographics, initial cervical dilatation hours on parenteral magnesium sulfate, recurrent contractions, or side effects between the two groups. The cost was also similar (Mg-c, $1.40/d; Mg-g, $2.11/d). The serum magnesium levels were higher in the Mg-c group (1.80 +/- 0.28 mg/dl) compared to the Mg-g group (1.63 +/- 0.30 mg/dl) but the difference was not significant.

Conclusion: These two preparations of magnesium are similar in their effects on uterine activity and serum levels when used at these dosages.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types