Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1998 May;51(5):708-13.
doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00111-3.

Pubovaginal sling using polypropylene mesh and Vesica bone anchors

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Pubovaginal sling using polypropylene mesh and Vesica bone anchors

D Hom et al. Urology. 1998 May.

Abstract

Objectives: To report preliminary results from a modified pubovaginal sling procedure using polypropylene mesh as the sling suspended by nonabsorbable sutures anchored to the pubic tubercle with Vesica bone anchors.

Methods: Thirty-five women with type III stress urinary incontinence (SUI) (with or without associated urethral hypermobility) or type II SUI with additional risk factors such as obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or failed prior incontinence-correcting procedures underwent this modified pubovaginal sling procedure. Postoperative voiding status was evaluated during office follow-up visits and telephone surveys.

Results: With a mean follow-up of 8.4 months (range 2 to 18), 32 women (91.4%) were dry, 1 improved, and 2 remained incontinent. The pubovaginal sling procedure was the only operation performed in 46% of patients, with a mean operative time of 72 minutes, a mean estimated blood loss of 137 mL, and a mean hospital period of 2.3 days. Patients on whom concomitant gynecologic procedures were performed had a mean duration of surgery of 122 minutes, a mean estimated blood loss of 202 mL, and a mean hospitalization period of 2.9 days. Thirteen women had preoperative urgency that persisted in 31% of patients. De novo urgency developed in 3 patients. Seven women required prolonged suprapubic tube drainage but no patient remained in permanent retention. There has been no infection or erosion.

Conclusions: Our experience with this modified pubovaginal sling procedure using polypropylene mesh and Vesica bone anchors showed excellent results with greater technical ease, minimal morbidity, and decreased hospitalization period when compared to a traditional pubovaginal sling performed in our hands. Additional follow-up will be needed to assess long-term efficacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources