Ring block for neonatal circumcision
- PMID: 9610998
- DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00093-3
Ring block for neonatal circumcision
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether a difference in the behavioral and physiologic response to circumcision can be demonstrated between neonates undergoing the procedure with ring block and those receiving no anesthesia.
Methods: Forty healthy male newborns were assigned randomly to receive either ring block or no anesthesia. Indices of perceived pain including crying time, behavioral state, oxygen saturation, and heart and respiratory rates were recorded at baseline and at intervals during the circumcision. Infants were reassessed 2 minutes and 2 hours postoperatively.
Results: Infants receiving ring block cried less than did controls (P < .001). Anesthetized infants had smaller increases in heart rate (P < .005) and demonstrated less arousal (P < .005) during each operative interval. For all operative intervals combined, anesthetized infants had a smaller decrease in oxygen saturation (P < .001) and a smaller increase in respiratory rate (P = .005) than did controls. Two minutes postoperatively, anesthetized infants had returned to their baseline behavioral state, whereas controls remained significantly more aroused (P < .005). Two hours postoperatively, there were no significant differences in any variables between the groups, nor between each group and its baseline. There were no complications related to anesthesia administration.
Conclusion: Neonatal circumcision causes behavioral and physiologic changes consistent with the perception of pain. Ring block is an effective method of anesthesia for this procedure.
Comment in
-
Ring block for neonatal circumcision.Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Nov;92(5):891-2. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00356-1. Obstet Gynecol. 1998. PMID: 9794691 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of ring block, dorsal penile nerve block, and topical anesthesia for neonatal circumcision: a randomized controlled trial.JAMA. 1997 Dec 24-31;278(24):2157-62. JAMA. 1997. PMID: 9417009 Clinical Trial.
-
Penile nerve block for newborn circumcision.Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Sep;70(3 Pt 1):415-9. Obstet Gynecol. 1987. PMID: 3627593 Clinical Trial.
-
Anesthesia for neonatal circumcision: local anesthesia is better than dorsal penile nerve block.Obstet Gynecol. 1990 May;75(5):834-8. Obstet Gynecol. 1990. PMID: 2183111 Clinical Trial.
-
Circumcision anesthesia: a study of nursing implications for dorsal penile nerve block.Pediatr Nurs. 1997 Jan-Feb;23(1):59-63. Pediatr Nurs. 1997. PMID: 9137023 Review.
-
A systematic review of lidocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA) in the treatment of acute pain in neonates.Pediatrics. 1998 Feb;101(2):E1. doi: 10.1542/peds.101.2.e1. Pediatrics. 1998. PMID: 9445511
Cited by
-
Comparison of the effects of ring block and dorsal penile nerve block on parental satisfaction for circumcision operation in children: randomized controlled trial.Pediatr Surg Int. 2024 Apr 8;40(1):101. doi: 10.1007/s00383-024-05681-5. Pediatr Surg Int. 2024. PMID: 38587622 Clinical Trial.
-
Pain management for neonatal circumcision.Paediatr Drugs. 2001;3(2):101-11. doi: 10.2165/00128072-200103020-00003. Paediatr Drugs. 2001. PMID: 11269637 Review.
-
Male circumcision: towards a World Health Organisation normative practice in resource limited settings.Asian J Androl. 2010 Sep;12(5):628-38. doi: 10.1038/aja.2010.59. Epub 2010 Jul 19. Asian J Androl. 2010. PMID: 20639909 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pain relief for neonatal circumcision.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18;2004(4):CD004217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004217.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004. PMID: 15495086 Free PMC article.
-
Bupivacaine versus lidocaine analgesia for neonatal circumcision.BMC Pediatr. 2005 May 22;5(1):12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-5-12. BMC Pediatr. 2005. PMID: 15907216 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical