Competence, professional self regulation, and the public interest

R Klein¹

Affiliations

R Klein. BMJ. 1998.

. 1998 Jun 6;316(7146):1740-2.

doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7146.1740.

R Klein¹

¹ Centre for the Analysis of Social Policy, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY. R.E.Klein@bath.ac.uk

No abstract available

Figures

The aftermath of the Bristol case. Doctors should not have to fail before they are given support.
McKinstry B. McKinstry B. BMJ. 1998 Sep 19;317(7161):811. BMJ. 1998. PMID: 9786660 No abstract available.
The aftermath of the Bristol case. Concept of collective responsibility is important.
Egan J. Egan J. BMJ. 1998 Sep 19;317(7161):813. BMJ. 1998. PMID: 9786666 No abstract available.
The aftermath of the Bristol case. Bristol case highlights potential weakness of Calman system.
Banerjee AK. Banerjee AK. BMJ. 1998 Sep 19;317(7161):815. BMJ. 1998. PMID: 9786673 No abstract available.
The aftermath of the Bristol case. Roles of GMC, royal colleges, and Department of Health remain unclear.
Kerrison S. Kerrison S. BMJ. 1998 Sep 19;317(7161):815-6. BMJ. 1998. PMID: 9786676 No abstract available.

1. Irvine D. The performance of doctors. II. Maintaining good practice, protecting patients from poor performance. BMJ. 1997;314:1613–1615. - PMC - PubMed
1. Boseley S. Faith under the knife. The Guardian 1998;18 February:2-3.
1. Wells W. Review of cervical screening services at Kent and Canterbury Hospitals NHS Trust. London: NHS Executive; 1997.
1. General Medical Council. Good Medical Practice. London: GMC; 1995.
1. Calman K. Maintaining medical excellence: review of guidance on doctors’ performance. Final report. London: Department of Health; 1995.