Mediation of deet repellency in mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) by species, age, and parity
- PMID: 9615557
- DOI: 10.1093/jmedent/35.3.340
Mediation of deet repellency in mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) by species, age, and parity
Abstract
Laboratory bioassays assessed differences in the protection time provided by the repellent deet (N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide) against 5-d-old nulliparous and 10-, 15-, and 20-d-old nulliparous and parous female Aedes aegypti (L.), Anopheles albimanus (Weidemann), and Anopheles quadrimaculatus Say sensu lato. Mean protection time was shortest against An. albimanus (1.6 h) and An. quadrimaculatus (1.5 h) and longest against Ae. aegypti (6.5 h), but was not significantly influenced by mosquito age or parity. Mean percentage of biting at repellent failure time was highest in An. albimanus (14.2%), followed by An. quadrimaculatus (7.0%) and Ae. aegypti (2.9%), was higher in parous females (10.8%) than in nulliparous females (5.9%), and was highest overall (35%) in 20-d-old parous An. albimanus. Interaction between mosquito species and parity and between parity and age factors, respectively, resulted from a significant decrease in percentage of biting by parous An. quadrimaculatus compared with other females, and a significant increase in biting by 20-d-old parous females compared with other females. The main finding of this study is that repellent protection time is unaffected by parity; this is important because parous mosquitoes are the primary target of personal-protection measures in disease-endemic areas. When repellent failure did occur, there was a higher risk of bite by old, parous An. albimanus than for any other species, age, or parity grouping of females.
Similar articles
-
Mosquito density, biting rate and cage size effects on repellent tests.Med Vet Entomol. 1998 Jan;12(1):39-45. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2915.1998.00078.x. Med Vet Entomol. 1998. PMID: 9513937
-
Effects of in vivo exposure to DEET on blood feeding behavior and fecundity in Anopheles quadrimaculatus (Diptera: Culicidae).Exp Parasitol. 2007 Jul;116(3):201-4. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2006.12.011. Epub 2007 Jan 10. Exp Parasitol. 2007. PMID: 17286972
-
Single blinded semi-field evaluation of MAÏA® topical repellent ointment compared to unformulated 20% DEET against Anopheles gambiae, Anopheles arabiensis and Aedes aegypti in Tanzania.Malar J. 2021 Jan 6;20(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-03461-9. Malar J. 2021. PMID: 33407496 Free PMC article.
-
The efficacy of repellents against Aedes, Anopheles, Culex and Ixodes spp. - a literature review.Travel Med Infect Dis. 2013 Nov-Dec;11(6):374-411. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2013.10.005. Epub 2013 Oct 25. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2013. PMID: 24201040 Review.
-
Plants traditionally used as mosquito repellents and the implication for their use in vector control.Acta Trop. 2016 May;157:136-44. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.01.024. Epub 2016 Jan 27. Acta Trop. 2016. PMID: 26826392 Review.
Cited by
-
Can topical insect repellents reduce malaria? A cluster-randomised controlled trial of the insect repellent N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) in Lao PDR.PLoS One. 2013 Aug 14;8(8):e70664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070664. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23967083 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
DEET Efficacy Increases With Age in the Vector Mosquitoes Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae).J Med Entomol. 2018 Oct 25;55(6):1542-1548. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjy134. J Med Entomol. 2018. PMID: 30137424 Free PMC article.
-
A cluster-randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of using 15% DEET topical repellent with long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) compared to a placebo lotion on malaria transmission.Malar J. 2014 Aug 16;13:324. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-13-324. Malar J. 2014. PMID: 25129515 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical