Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1998 Apr;42(4):560-5.
doi: 10.1136/gut.42.4.560.

Uptake, yield of neoplasia, and adverse effects of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Uptake, yield of neoplasia, and adverse effects of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening

W S Atkin et al. Gut. 1998 Apr.

Abstract

Background: A multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate screening by "once only" flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) for prevention of bowel cancer is in progress.

Aims: To pilot the trial protocol examining rates of attendance, yield of neoplasia, and adverse effects.

Subjects: A total of 3540 subjects aged 55-64 years in Welwyn Garden City (WGC) and 19,706 in Leicester (LE).

Methods: Subjects responding positively to an "interest in screening" questionnaire were randomised to invitation for screening or control arms. Small polyps were removed during screening. Colonoscopy was undertaken for high risk polyps (more than two adenomas, size at least 1 cm, villous histology, severe dysplasia, or malignancy). The remainder were discharged.

Results: In WGC and LE respectively, 59% and 61% indicated an interest in screening, of which 74% and 75% attended. Adenomas were detected in 10% and 9%, respectively, and cancers in 7 per 1000 (in both centres), 55% at Dukes's stage A. The colonoscopy referral rate was 6% in both centres. Mild, short lived bleeding occurred in 3%. One person died following surgery.

Conclusions: Compliance rates, yield of adenomas, and referral rate for colonoscopy were as expected, but cancer detection rates were higher. Adverse effects following sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy were mild and transient, but there was one postoperative death. A randomised trial is necessary to evaluate fully the risks and benefits of this intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Two stage screening procedure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Follow up after flexible sigmoidoscopy.

References

    1. Dig Dis Sci. 1984 Feb;29(2):161-3 - PubMed
    1. Am J Gastroenterol. 1984 Jun;79(6):433-7 - PubMed
    1. Gastroenterology. 1989 Feb;96(2 Pt 1):299-306 - PubMed
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1989 May;32(5):404-8 - PubMed
    1. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1991;80(1):30-5 - PubMed

Publication types