Effect of mammographic breast density on breast cancer screening performance: a study in Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- PMID: 9616416
- PMCID: PMC1756693
- DOI: 10.1136/jech.52.4.267
Effect of mammographic breast density on breast cancer screening performance: a study in Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Abstract
Study objective: To study the implications of breast density on mammographic screening performance.
Design: Screening outcomes of women with dense breast patterns were compared with those of women with lucent breast patterns (dense > 25% densities, lucent < or = 25% densities); the women were screened in different periods (before/after improvement of the mammographic technique in 1982).
Setting: Nijmegen, the Netherlands, 1977-1994.
Participants: Between 1977 and 1994, 73,525 repeat screenings were performed in 19,152 participants (aged 50-69 years) in the Nijmegen breast cancer screening programme (repeat screenings were defined as mammographic examinations that were preceded by an examination in the previous screening round). Participants were screened biennially with mammography. There were 258 screen detected and 145 interval cancers.
Main results: Before 1982 (rounds 2-4) the predictive value of a positive screening test (PV+) was lower in women with dense breasts than in those with lucent breasts (dense 29% v lucent 52%, p = 0.003). Also, the ratio of screen detected cancers to the total number of screen detected plus interval cancers (as a proxy for sensitivity) was lower in this group (based on a one year interval: dense 63% v lucent 92%, p = 0.001 and based on a two year interval: dense 41% v lucent 68%, p = 0.002). Moreover, the survival rate was less favourable for those with dense breasts (p = 0.07). In rounds 5-10, there were no important differences with respect to PV+ (dense 66% v lucent 62%, p = 0.57) or survival (p = 0.48). Moreover, sensitivity based on a one year interval was nearly as high in women with dense breasts as in those with lucent breasts (85% v 86%, p = 0.75). However, based on a two year interval sensitivity was lower (dense 59% v lucent 72%, p = 0.04).
Conclusions: In the early screening years (rounds 2-4) high breast density had an unfavourable effect on screening performance. Nowadays, the situation has improved with respect to PV+, survival and detecting tumours in dense breasts with a lead time of up to one year, but little improvement has occurred in the detection of tumours with a lead time greater than one year.
Similar articles
-
Mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: masking bias or causality?Eur J Epidemiol. 1998 Jun;14(4):315-20. doi: 10.1023/a:1007423824675. Eur J Epidemiol. 1998. PMID: 9690746
-
Long term breast cancer screening in Nijmegen, The Netherlands: the nine rounds from 1975-92.J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996 Jun;50(3):353-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.50.3.353. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996. PMID: 8935470 Free PMC article.
-
MR Imaging as an Additional Screening Modality for the Detection of Breast Cancer in Women Aged 50-75 Years with Extremely Dense Breasts: The DENSE Trial Study Design.Radiology. 2015 Nov;277(2):527-37. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015141827. Epub 2015 Jun 23. Radiology. 2015. PMID: 26110667 Clinical Trial.
-
Ultrasound for breast cancer screening and staging.Radiol Clin North Am. 2002 May;40(3):431-41. doi: 10.1016/s0033-8389(01)00014-8. Radiol Clin North Am. 2002. PMID: 12117185 Review.
-
[Assessment of the dense breast within the French screening program: the role of ultrasonography].J Radiol. 2008 Sep;89(9 Pt 2):1180-6. doi: 10.1016/s0221-0363(08)73928-3. J Radiol. 2008. PMID: 18772802 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Breast ultrasound diagnostic performance and outcomes for mass lesions using Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 0 mammogram.Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66(3):443-8. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322011000300014. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011. PMID: 21552670 Free PMC article.
-
"High-Risk Breast Cancer Screening in BRCA1/2 Carriers Leads to Early Detection and Improved Survival After a Breast Cancer Diagnosis".Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 2;11:683656. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.683656. eCollection 2021. Front Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34540661 Free PMC article.
-
Deep learning identification of stiffness markers in breast cancer.Biomaterials. 2022 Jun;285:121540. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121540. Epub 2022 Apr 27. Biomaterials. 2022. PMID: 35537336 Free PMC article.
-
Geographic variation in volumetric breast density between screening regions in the Netherlands.Eur Radiol. 2015 Nov;25(11):3328-37. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3742-z. Epub 2015 Jul 3. Eur Radiol. 2015. PMID: 26134996 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Low frequency 3D transmission ultrasound tomography: technical details and clinical implications.Z Med Phys. 2023 Aug;33(3):427-443. doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.04.006. Epub 2023 Jun 7. Z Med Phys. 2023. PMID: 37295982 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical