Regulation of X-chromosome inactivation in development in mice and humans
- PMID: 9618446
- PMCID: PMC98919
- DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.62.2.362-378.1998
Regulation of X-chromosome inactivation in development in mice and humans
Abstract
Dosage compensation for X-linked genes in mammals is accomplished by inactivating one of the two X chromosomes in females. X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) occurs during development, coupled with cell differentiation. In somatic cells, XCI is random, whereas in extraembryonic tissues, XCI is imprinted in that the paternally inherited X chromosome is preferentially inactivated. Inactivation is initiated from an X-linked locus, the X-inactivation center (Xic), and inactivity spreads along the chromosome toward both ends. XCI is established by complex mechanisms, including DNA methylation, heterochromatinization, and late replication. Once established, inactivity is stably maintained in subsequent cell generations. The function of an X-linked regulatory gene, Xist, is critically involved in XCI. The Xist gene maps to the Xic, it is transcribed only from the inactive X chromosome, and the Xist RNA associates with the inactive X chromosome in the nucleus. Investigations with Xist-containing transgenes and with deletions of the Xist gene have shown that the Xist gene is required in cis for XCI. Regulation of XCI is therefore accomplished through regulation of Xist. Transcription of the Xist gene is itself regulated by DNA methylation. Hence, the differential methylation of the Xist gene observed in sperm and eggs and its recognition by protein binding constitute the most likely mechanism regulating imprinted preferential expression of the paternal allele in preimplantation embryos and imprinted paternal XCI in extraembryonic tissues. This article reviews the mechanisms underlying XCI and recent advances elucidating the functions of the Xist gene in mice and humans.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Failure of extra-embryonic progenitor maintenance in the absence of dosage compensation.Development. 2012 Jun;139(12):2130-8. doi: 10.1242/dev.076497. Epub 2012 May 9. Development. 2012. PMID: 22573614 Free PMC article.
-
Eutherian mammals use diverse strategies to initiate X-chromosome inactivation during development.Nature. 2011 Apr 21;472(7343):370-4. doi: 10.1038/nature09872. Epub 2011 Apr 6. Nature. 2011. PMID: 21471966
-
Expression of an Xist promoter-luciferase construct during spermatogenesis and in preimplantation embryos: regulation by DNA methylation.Mol Reprod Dev. 1998 Apr;49(4):356-67. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199804)49:4<356::AID-MRD2>3.0.CO;2-M. Mol Reprod Dev. 1998. PMID: 9508086
-
X chromosome imprinting and inactivation in the early mammalian embryo.Trends Genet. 1996 Apr;12(4):134-8. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(96)10017-2. Trends Genet. 1996. PMID: 8901417 Review.
-
Female-bias in systemic lupus erythematosus: How much is the X chromosome to blame?Biol Sex Differ. 2024 Oct 7;15(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13293-024-00650-y. Biol Sex Differ. 2024. PMID: 39375734 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
HDAC inhibitors and decitabine are highly synergistic and associated with unique gene-expression and epigenetic profiles in models of DLBCL.Blood. 2011 Nov 17;118(20):5506-16. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-02-336891. Epub 2011 Jul 19. Blood. 2011. PMID: 21772049 Free PMC article.
-
Challenges and Strategies in Ascribing Functions to Long Noncoding RNAs.Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jun 3;12(6):1458. doi: 10.3390/cancers12061458. Cancers (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32503290 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Epigenetic processes in a tetraploid mammal.Mamm Genome. 2008 Jun;19(6):439-47. doi: 10.1007/s00335-008-9131-z. Epub 2008 Aug 29. Mamm Genome. 2008. PMID: 18758856
-
Maternal high-fat diet associated with altered gene expression, DNA methylation, and obesity risk in mouse offspring.PLoS One. 2018 Feb 15;13(2):e0192606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192606. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29447215 Free PMC article.
-
DNA Methylation of Gene Expression in Acanthamoeba castellanii Encystation.Korean J Parasitol. 2017 Apr;55(2):115-120. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2017.55.2.115. Epub 2017 Apr 30. Korean J Parasitol. 2017. PMID: 28506032 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Adams R L P, Burdon R H, McKinnon K, Rinaldi A. Stimulation of de novo methylation following limited proteolysis of mouse ascites DNA methylase. FEBS Lett. 1983;163:194–198. - PubMed
-
- Adams R L P. Eukaryotic DNA methyltransferases—structure and function. Bioessays. 1995;17:139–145. - PubMed
-
- Antequera F, Boyes J, Bird A P. High levels of de novo methylation and altered chromatin structure at CpG islands in cell lines. Cell. 1990;62:503–514. - PubMed
-
- Ariel M, Robinson E, McCarrey J R, Cedar H. Gamete-specific methylation correlates with imprinting of the murine Xist gene. Nat Genet. 1995;9:312–315. - PubMed
-
- Barlow D P, Stoger R, Herrmann B G, Saito K, Schweiter N. The mouse insulin-like growth factor type-2 receptor is imprinted and closely linked to the Tme locus. Nature. 1991;349:84–87. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources