Local recurrence of breast cancer after cytological evaluation of lumpectomy margins
- PMID: 9619174
Local recurrence of breast cancer after cytological evaluation of lumpectomy margins
Abstract
Successful breast conservation therapy with optimal cosmesis requires adequate tumor excision and negative tumor margins. Therefore, more sensitive techniques are being developed to identify lumpectomy margins intraoperatively with greater accuracy. Unidentified microscopic disease is seemingly responsible for a local recurrence rate of up to 25 per cent 3 to 5 years after lumpectomy and radiotherapy for breast cancer patients. As a result, Moffitt Cancer Center has routinely used an intraoperative touch preparation cytology (TPC) protocol to evaluate the entire resected surface of all lumpectomies. In addition, resection margins were also evaluated by gross examination and by standard histology. In rare instances frozen sections were used to evaluate tumor margins. In this study 701 consecutive lumpectomy specimens were evaluated by TPC during the period of 9 years with a mean follow-up of 3.5 years. Local cancer recurrence was 2.7 per cent (mean recurrence, 2.53 years), in women whose lumpectomy margins were evaluated by TPC. Of interest, a local recurrence rate of 14.6 per cent was observed in patients who had referral lumpectomies evaluated by conventional histopathology. This study suggests that accurate margin assessment with TPC plays an important role in the control of local recurrence after breast conservation therapy. Therefore, we conclude the routine use of intraoperative TPC provides rapid, reliable, topographically accurate identification of residual microscopic disease at lumpectomy margins.
Similar articles
-
Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Mar;14(3):1045-50. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9263-x. Epub 2007 Jan 6. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007. PMID: 17206481
-
Use of imprint cytology for assessment of surgical margins in lumpectomy specimens of breast cancer patients.Diagn Cytopathol. 2007 Oct;35(10):656-9. doi: 10.1002/dc.20704. Diagn Cytopathol. 2007. PMID: 17854083
-
The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer.Breast J. 2006 Jul-Aug;12(4):331-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00271.x. Breast J. 2006. PMID: 16848842
-
Local recurrence in lumpectomy patients after imprint cytology margin evaluation.Am J Surg. 2004 Oct;188(4):349-54. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.06.024. Am J Surg. 2004. PMID: 15474425 Review.
-
Close/positive margins after breast-conserving therapy: additional resection or no resection?Breast. 2013 Aug;22 Suppl 2:S115-7. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.07.022. Breast. 2013. PMID: 24074771 Review.
Cited by
-
Is mastectomy overused? A call for an expanded research agenda.Health Serv Res. 2002 Apr;37(2):417-31. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.030. Health Serv Res. 2002. PMID: 12036001 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The importance of surgical margins in breast cancer.J Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar;113(3):256-63. doi: 10.1002/jso.24047. Epub 2015 Sep 23. J Surg Oncol. 2016. PMID: 26394558 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Toolbox to Reduce Lumpectomy Reoperations and Improve Cosmetic Outcome in Breast Cancer Patients: The American Society of Breast Surgeons Consensus Conference.Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Oct;22(10):3174-83. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4759-x. Epub 2015 Jul 28. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26215198 Free PMC article.
-
Breast-conserving therapy for palpable and nonpalpable breast cancer: can surgical residents do the job irrespective of experience?World J Surg. 2007 Sep;31(9):1731-1736. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9176-2. World J Surg. 2007. PMID: 17632753 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Research Materials