The cross-over effect in unilateral neglect. Modelling detailed data in the line-bisection task
- PMID: 9619193
- DOI: 10.1093/brain/121.5.907
The cross-over effect in unilateral neglect. Modelling detailed data in the line-bisection task
Abstract
The line-bisection task is the standard assessment of unilateral visual neglect. It supplies one effect, the crossover effect, that challenges models of neglect: in left neglect, the rightward displacement of the midpoint of the line becomes a left displacement for small lines. We review the various attempts to account for the cross-over effect, before describing a computational model of performance in the line-bisection task that produces a cross-over effect quite naturally in its damaged state. The model trades on aspects of several current theories of neglect, including independent attentional processing in the two hemispheres, each of which possesses an attentional gradient in which the contralateral field is accentuated. We assume a small residual noise, along the same gradient, in the damaged hemisphere. When lesioned to simulate right hemisphere damage, the model produces line bisections similar to human performance, in terms of the relationship with line length, a variable cross-over point for the smaller lines, and an amelioration of performance with leftside, but not rightside cueing.
Similar articles
-
Image of a line is not shrunk but neglected. Absence of crossover in unilateral spatial neglect.Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(2):251-6. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(03)00153-2. Neuropsychologia. 2004. PMID: 14644110
-
Visuospatial processes of line bisection and the mechanisms underlying unilateral spatial neglect.Brain. 1989 Dec;112 ( Pt 6):1485-502. doi: 10.1093/brain/112.6.1485. Brain. 1989. PMID: 2597992
-
Ineffective leftward search in line bisection and mechanisms of left unilateral spatial neglect.J Neurol. 1996 May;243(5):381-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00868996. J Neurol. 1996. PMID: 8741077
-
Different patterns of dissociation in unilateral spatial neglect.Brain Cogn. 1991 Mar;15(2):139-59. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(91)90023-2. Brain Cogn. 1991. PMID: 2043361 Review.
-
Visual size processing in spatial neglect.Exp Brain Res. 1998 Nov;123(1-2):192-200. doi: 10.1007/s002210050561. Exp Brain Res. 1998. PMID: 9835409 Review.
Cited by
-
A rightward shift in the visuospatial attention vector with healthy aging.Front Aging Neurosci. 2014 Jun 10;6:113. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00113. eCollection 2014. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 24959142 Free PMC article.
-
Modelling the differential effects of prisms on perception and action in neglect.Exp Brain Res. 2015 Mar;233(3):751-66. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-4150-3. Epub 2014 Nov 28. Exp Brain Res. 2015. PMID: 25430546
-
Alzheimer's patients do not show left unilateral spatial neglect but exhibit peripheral inattention and simplification.Dement Neuropsychol. 2007 Oct-Dec;1(4):374-380. doi: 10.1590/S1980-57642008DN10400008. Dement Neuropsychol. 2007. PMID: 29213414 Free PMC article.
-
Biases in attentional orientation and magnitude estimation explain crossover: neglect is a disorder of both.J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Aug;17(8):1194-211. doi: 10.1162/0898929055002454. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005. PMID: 16197678 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A model of amygdala-hippocampal-prefrontal interaction in fear conditioning and extinction in animals.Brain Cogn. 2013 Feb;81(1):29-43. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.10.005. Epub 2012 Nov 17. Brain Cogn. 2013. PMID: 23164732 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical