Similar articles

• Economic evaluation of reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing in patients with closed and open tibial fractures: results from the study to prospectively evaluate reamed intramedullary nails in patients with tibial fractures (SPRINT).

  SPRINT Investigators; Briel M, Sprague S, Heels-Ansdell D, Guyatt G, Bhandari M, Blackhouse G, Sanders D, Schemitsch E, Swiontkowski M, Tornetta P 3rd, Walter SD, Goeree R. SPRINT Investigators, et al. Value Health. 2011 Jun;14(4):450-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.10.034. Epub 2011 May 25. Value Health. 2011. PMID: 21669369 Clinical Trial.
• Reamed or unreamed nailing for closed tibial fractures.

  Harrington P, Smyth H, Fenelon GC, Sharif I. Harrington P, et al. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997 Jul;79(4):697-8. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997. PMID: 9250773 No abstract available.
• A meta-analysis of reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing for the treatment of closed tibial fractures.

  Xia L, Zhou J, Zhang Y, Mei G, Jin D. Xia L, et al. Orthopedics. 2014 Apr;37(4):e332-8. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20140401-52. Orthopedics. 2014. PMID: 24762836
• [Intramedullary nailing of lower leg fractures with minimal soft tissue injuries].

  Ruchholtz S, Nast-Kolb D, Schweiberer L. Ruchholtz S, et al. Orthopade. 1996 Jun;25(3):197-206. Orthopade. 1996. PMID: 8766658 Review. German.
• [Borderline indications for locked intramedullary nailing of femur and tibia].

  Vécsei V, Seitz H, Greitbauer M, Heinz T. Vécsei V, et al. Orthopade. 1996 Jun;25(3):234-46. Orthopade. 1996. PMID: 8766662 Review. German.