Electrophysiological evidence for dissociable processes contributing to recollection
- PMID: 9621832
- DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(97)00044-9
Electrophysiological evidence for dissociable processes contributing to recollection
Abstract
This paper reviews a number of studies in which we have employed event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate the cognitive processes which contribute to conscious recollection. Across a range of tasks (including recognition memory, source memory, associative recall and word-stem cued recall) there is evidence for the proposal that recollection involves processes which are both functionally and neurologically dissociable. This evidence takes the form of temporally and topographically dissociable ERP effects, which attain their maximum amplitude when elicited by items that satisfy operational definitions for having been recollected. The ERP effects are interpreted as reflecting retrieval and post-retrieval processes which, we argue, constitute two separate components of recollection as defined within the process dissociation framework of Jacoby and colleagues. The ERP findings suggest that post-retrieval processing is particularly sensitive to task variables, implying that recollection may be neither functionally nor neurologically homogeneous.
Similar articles
-
Event-related potential studies of associative recognition and recall: electrophysiological evidence for context dependent retrieval processes.Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1999 May;8(1):1-16. doi: 10.1016/s0926-6410(98)00051-2. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1999. PMID: 10216269
-
Neural correlates of cued recall with and without retrieval of source memory.Neuroreport. 1998 Oct 26;9(15):3463-6. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199810260-00023. Neuroreport. 1998. PMID: 9855299
-
An event-related potential study of explicit memory on tests of cued recall and recognition.Neuropsychologia. 1997 Apr;35(4):387-97. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(96)00094-2. Neuropsychologia. 1997. PMID: 9106268 Clinical Trial.
-
Event-related potentials and recognition memory.Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Jun;11(6):251-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.04.004. Epub 2007 May 3. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007. PMID: 17481940 Review.
-
Electrophysiological measures of familiarity memory.Clin EEG Neurosci. 2006 Oct;37(4):292-9. doi: 10.1177/155005940603700406. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2006. PMID: 17073167 Review.
Cited by
-
Recollection and familiarity in recognition memory: an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study.J Neurosci. 1999 May 15;19(10):3962-72. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-10-03962.1999. J Neurosci. 1999. PMID: 10234026 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Separating content-specific retrieval from post-retrieval processing.Cortex. 2017 Jan;86:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Oct 19. Cortex. 2017. PMID: 27866038 Free PMC article.
-
Conceptual fluency at test shifts recognition response bias in Alzheimer's disease: implications for increased false recognition.Neuropsychologia. 2007 Sep 20;45(12):2791-801. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.04.021. Epub 2007 May 10. Neuropsychologia. 2007. PMID: 17573074 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Mental Schemas Hamper Memory Storage of Goal-Irrelevant Information.Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Nov 26;9:629. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00629. eCollection 2015. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015. PMID: 26635582 Free PMC article.
-
A meta-analysis of event-related potential correlates of recognition memory.Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Dec;30(6):2083-2105. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02309-y. Epub 2023 Jul 11. Psychon Bull Rev. 2023. PMID: 37434046 Free PMC article. Review.