The need for revised standards for skinfold thickness in infancy
- PMID: 9623400
- PMCID: PMC1717548
- DOI: 10.1136/adc.78.4.354
The need for revised standards for skinfold thickness in infancy
Abstract
Skinfold standards provide a useful indication of subcutaneous fat. To evaluate skinfold thickness of 252 Cambridge infants over the first 2 years of age, SD scores relative to the Tanner standards were calculated, taking account of skewness in the standards. Cambridge SD scores were low, varying according to age from -1.2 to -1.8 for triceps and -0.6 to -1.2 for subscapular skinfolds. The Tanner skinfold standards were last revised 30 years ago, at a time of high prevalence of infantile obesity, and the present and other studies indicate that infants are now thinner. There is a need for new skinfold standards to reflect this change. Since the Cambridge infants contributed to the recent British height and weight references, it is suggested that their skinfold measurements could also serve as reference points.
Similar articles
-
Adequacy of standards for assessment of growth and nutritional status in infancy and early childhood.Arch Dis Child. 1999 Feb;80(2):121-4. doi: 10.1136/adc.80.2.121. Arch Dis Child. 1999. PMID: 10325725 Free PMC article.
-
A comparison of three infant skinfold reference standards: Tanner-Whitehouse, Cambridge Infant Growth Study, and WHO Child Growth Standards.Matern Child Nutr. 2015 Oct;11(4):1023-7. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12111. Epub 2014 Feb 13. Matern Child Nutr. 2015. PMID: 24521298 Free PMC article.
-
Revised standards for triceps and subscapular skinfolds in British children.Arch Dis Child. 1975 Feb;50(2):142-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.50.2.142. Arch Dis Child. 1975. PMID: 1130819 Free PMC article.
-
Breast-fed infants grow more slowly than infants fed formula and solids.Nutr Rev. 1986 May;44(5):168-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.1986.tb07616.x. Nutr Rev. 1986. PMID: 3523318 Review. No abstract available.
-
[WHO growth standards for infants and young children].Arch Pediatr. 2009 Jan;16(1):47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2008.10.010. Epub 2008 Nov 25. Arch Pediatr. 2009. PMID: 19036567 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Adequacy of standards for assessment of growth and nutritional status in infancy and early childhood.Arch Dis Child. 1999 Feb;80(2):121-4. doi: 10.1136/adc.80.2.121. Arch Dis Child. 1999. PMID: 10325725 Free PMC article.
-
A comparison of three infant skinfold reference standards: Tanner-Whitehouse, Cambridge Infant Growth Study, and WHO Child Growth Standards.Matern Child Nutr. 2015 Oct;11(4):1023-7. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12111. Epub 2014 Feb 13. Matern Child Nutr. 2015. PMID: 24521298 Free PMC article.
-
The Effect of Nutritional Status on Outcome of Hospitalization in Paediatric Liver Disease Patients.J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Dec;10(12):SC01-SC05. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/21606.8956. Epub 2016 Dec 1. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016. PMID: 28208962 Free PMC article.
-
A critique of the expression of paediatric body composition data.Arch Dis Child. 2001 Jul;85(1):67-72. doi: 10.1136/adc.85.1.67. Arch Dis Child. 2001. PMID: 11420208 Free PMC article.
-
Skinfold Thickness Measurement in Term Nigerian Neonates: Establishing Reference Values.Int J Pediatr. 2018 Jan 1;2018:3624548. doi: 10.1155/2018/3624548. eCollection 2018. Int J Pediatr. 2018. PMID: 29535787 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources