Esophageal manometry: a comparison of findings in younger and older patients
- PMID: 9625113
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.210_a.x
Esophageal manometry: a comparison of findings in younger and older patients
Abstract
Objective: We sought to determine the utility of esophageal manometry in an older patient population.
Methods: Consecutively performed manometry studies (470) were reviewed and two groups were chosen for the study, those > or = 75 yr of age (66 patients) and those < or = 50 years (122 patients). Symptoms, manometric findings (lower esophageal sphincter [LES], esophageal body, upper esophageal sphincter [UES]) and diagnoses were compared between the groups.
Results: Dysphagia was more common (60.6% vs 25.4%), and chest pain was less common (17.9 vs 26.2%) in older patients. In the entire group, there were no differences in LES parameters. Older patients with achalasia had lower LES residual pressures after deglutition (2.7 vs 12.0 mm Hg), but had similar resting pressures (31.4 vs 35.2 mm Hg) compared with younger achalasia patients. Duration and amplitude of peristalsis were similar in both groups, whereas peristaltic sequences were more likely to be simultaneous in the older group (15% vs 4%). The UES had a lower resting pressure in the older patients (49.6 vs 77.6 mm Hg) and a higher residual pressure (2.0 vs -2.7 mm Hg). The older patients were less likely to have normal motility (30.3% vs 44.3%) and were more likely to have achalasia (15.2% vs 4.1%) or diffuse esophageal spasm (16.6% vs 5.0%). When only patients with dysphagia were analyzed, achalasia was still more likely in the older group (20.0% vs 12.9%).
Conclusion: When older patients present with dysphagia, esophageal manometry frequently yields a diagnosis to help explain their symptoms.
Similar articles
-
Esophageal motility differences among aged patients with achalasia: a Taiwan report.J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Nov;22(11):1737-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04720.x. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007. PMID: 17914943
-
Deterioration of esophageal motility with age: a manometric study of 79 healthy subjects.Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Jul;94(7):1795-801. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01208.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999. PMID: 10406237
-
Manometry and impedance characteristics of achalasia. Facts and myths.J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008 Mar;42(3):266-70. doi: 10.1097/01.mcg.0000248013.78020.b4. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008. PMID: 18223498
-
Clinical aspects and manometric criteria in achalasia.Hepatogastroenterology. 1991 Dec;38(6):481-7. Hepatogastroenterology. 1991. PMID: 1778574 Review.
-
[Role of deglutitive inhibition in the pathophysiology of esophageal primary motor disorders].Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 1999 Oct;91(10):711-5. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 1999. PMID: 10601760 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
Systematic Review of Pharyngeal and Esophageal Manometry in Healthy or Dysphagic Older Persons (>60 years).Geriatrics (Basel). 2018 Oct 5;3(4):67. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics3040067. Geriatrics (Basel). 2018. PMID: 31011102 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of aging on esophageal motility in patients with and without GERD.Ger Med Sci. 2011;9:Doc22. doi: 10.3205/000145. Epub 2011 Aug 18. Ger Med Sci. 2011. PMID: 21863136 Free PMC article.
-
Ineffective oesophageal motility: manometric subsets exhibit different symptom profiles.World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jun 21;14(23):3719-24. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.3719. World J Gastroenterol. 2008. PMID: 18595138 Free PMC article.
-
Timing of surgical intervention does not influence return of esophageal peristalsis or outcome for patients with achalasia.Surg Endosc. 2005 Sep;19(9):1188-92. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-8199-0. Epub 2005 Jul 28. Surg Endosc. 2005. PMID: 16132324
-
Esophageal peristaltic defects in adults with functional dysphagia.Dysphagia. 2014 Aug;29(4):519-26. doi: 10.1007/s00455-014-9540-y. Epub 2014 Jun 4. Dysphagia. 2014. PMID: 24894375
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical