Improved targeting of brain tumors using dexrazoxane rescue of topoisomerase II combined with supralethal doses of etoposide and teniposide

Abstract

Dexrazoxane (ICRF-187) is a catalytic inhibitor of the nuclear enzyme DNA topoisomerase II (topo II). It protects cells against topo II poisons, such as etoposide and teniposide, by hindering the DNA cleavage reaction of the target enzyme. We have previously shown that this antagonism also extends to an in vivo model. Thus, ICRF-187 protected mice against supralethal doses of etoposide and amsacrine, and the etoposide LD10 dose increased as much as 3.6-fold when combined with ICRF-187 (B. Holm, Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., 38: 203-209, 1996). We describe here how scheduling of this drug combination can be optimized and used. Interestingly, ICRF-187 can protect when it is given after etoposide. Although timing is very critical here, ICRF-187 was able to completely protect when given 10 min after etoposide. This rescue principle resembles methotrexate rescue by folinic acid. We also found scheduling to be crucial because ICRF-187 did not protect when etoposide was given once a day for five days, whereas effective protection was seen when etoposide was used three times, once every four days. Similar investigations were performed with teniposide in combination with ICRF-187. The combination with ICRF-187 allowed a 3.4-fold teniposide dose escalation. Such dose escalations could be advantageous in specific situations. One such case is when the tumor is situated in a pharmacological sanctuary, e.g., in the brain. ICRF-187 is hydrophilic and does not cross the blood-brain barrier, whereas the lipophilic etoposide and teniposide do. Therefore, ICRF-187 would protect normal tissues and allow a cytotoxic dose of etoposide to reach the central nervous system (CNS). We therefore studied the combinations using L1210 or EHR2 cells inoculated into the CNS of mice. L1210 presented a leukemic CNS model with leptomeningeal spread and infiltration of liver, spleen, and lymph nodes, whereas EHR2 cells acted as a solid tumor with no evidence of extracerebral disease. In all experiments, the combination of high-dose etoposide and ICRF-187 was significantly superior to an equitoxic dose of etoposide alone. Such superiority was also seen when treatment was given on days 4, 8, and 12 after tumor inoculation. Here etoposide alone resulted in a mean increased life span of 12.3%, whereas the rescue regimen yielded an increase of 47% (P < 0.0001). In conclusion, DNA topo II rescue by catalytic inhibitors is a new strategy enabling significant epipodophyllotoxin dose escalations; in this study, we have demonstrated the superiority of this strategy in two in vivo CNS tumor models. This concept is now being tested in a clinical trial.