Probing the locus of confidence judgments: experiments on the time to determine confidence
- PMID: 9627426
- DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.24.3.929
Probing the locus of confidence judgments: experiments on the time to determine confidence
Abstract
Three experiments investigated the properties of the time to determine confidence to determine the processing locus for the judgment of confidence. Results suggest that when the primary decision is made under speed stress, confidence is determined postdecisionally and involves a memory-based, computational algorithm. This strategy frees the primary decision of processing time and permits the accurate diagnosis of decision errors. When the primary decision is made under accuracy stress, however, the determination of confidence is initiated, or can even be completed, during the primary decision process. This strategy permits confidence to be used in the adaptive regulation of the decisional parameters during the decision process but yields poorer diagnosticity of errors when they occur. The latter finding also implies that primary decision latencies include time to determine confidence, rendering such data difficult, if not impossible, to model empirically. Implications for contemporary decision models that provide a basis for confidence in human judgment are discussed.
Similar articles
-
Judging confidence influences decision processing in comparative judgments.Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Mar;10(1):177-83. doi: 10.3758/bf03196482. Psychon Bull Rev. 2003. PMID: 12747505 Clinical Trial.
-
Testing architectures of the decision-confidence relation.Can J Exp Psychol. 2001 Sep;55(3):195-206. doi: 10.1037/h0087366. Can J Exp Psychol. 2001. PMID: 11605555 Clinical Trial.
-
The calibration and resolution of confidence in perceptual judgments.Percept Psychophys. 1994 Apr;55(4):412-28. doi: 10.3758/bf03205299. Percept Psychophys. 1994. PMID: 8036121
-
Heuristic reasoning and cognitive biases: Are they hindrances to judgments and decision making in orthodontics?Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Mar;139(3):297-304. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.05.018. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011. PMID: 21392683 Review.
-
A heuristics approach to understanding cancer risk perception: contributions from judgment and decision-making research.Ann Behav Med. 2006 Feb;31(1):45-52. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm3101_8. Ann Behav Med. 2006. PMID: 16472038 Review.
Cited by
-
Confidence response times: Challenging postdecisional models of confidence.J Vis. 2023 Jul 3;23(7):11. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.7.11. J Vis. 2023. PMID: 37450286 Free PMC article.
-
Judging confidence influences decision processing in comparative judgments.Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Mar;10(1):177-83. doi: 10.3758/bf03196482. Psychon Bull Rev. 2003. PMID: 12747505 Clinical Trial.
-
On the flexibility and the fallibility of associative memory.Mem Cognit. 2007 Apr;35(3):545-56. doi: 10.3758/bf03193293. Mem Cognit. 2007. PMID: 17691152
-
Modeling confidence and response time in associative recognition.J Mem Lang. 2016 Jan;86:60-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Oct 30. J Mem Lang. 2016. PMID: 27917018 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of evidence reliability on sensitivity and bias in decision confidence.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Aug;43(8):1520-1531. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000404. Epub 2017 Apr 6. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017. PMID: 28383959 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
