Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring
- PMID: 9634232
- DOI: 10.1038/31225
Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring
Abstract
Darwinian evolution has to provide an explanation for cooperative behaviour. Theories of cooperation are based on kin selection (dependent on genetic relatedness), group selection and reciprocal altruism. The idea of reciprocal altruism usually involves direct reciprocity: repeated encounters between the same individuals allow for the return of an altruistic act by the recipient. Here we present a new theoretical framework, which is based on indirect reciprocity and does not require the same two individuals ever to meet again. Individual selection can nevertheless favour cooperative strategies directed towards recipients that have helped others in the past. Cooperation pays because it confers the image of a valuable community member to the cooperating individual. We present computer simulations and analytic models that specify the conditions required for evolutionary stability of indirect reciprocity. We show that the probability of knowing the 'image' of the recipient must exceed the cost-to-benefit ratio of the altruistic act. We propose that the emergence of indirect reciprocity was a decisive step for the evolution of human societies.
Comment in
-
Evolutionary biology. Help and you shall be helped.Nature. 1998 Jun 11;393(6685):517, 519. doi: 10.1038/31102. Nature. 1998. PMID: 9634226 No abstract available.
-
Evolution of cooperation between individuals.Nature. 1999 Jul 15;400(6741):226-7. doi: 10.1038/22247. Nature. 1999. PMID: 10421362 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Effects of information and group structure on evolution of altruism: analysis of two-score model by covariance and contextual analyses.J Theor Biol. 2005 Jan 21;232(2):191-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.08.006. J Theor Biol. 2005. PMID: 15530489
-
The evolution of cooperation and altruism--a general framework and a classification of models.J Evol Biol. 2006 Sep;19(5):1365-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01119.x. J Evol Biol. 2006. PMID: 16910958 Review.
-
Evolution of cooperation without reciprocity.Nature. 2001 Nov 22;414(6862):441-3. doi: 10.1038/35106555. Nature. 2001. PMID: 11719803
-
Evolution of indirect reciprocity in groups of various sizes and comparison with direct reciprocity.J Theor Biol. 2007 Apr 7;245(3):539-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.11.002. Epub 2006 Nov 9. J Theor Biol. 2007. PMID: 17182063
-
Evolution of indirect reciprocity.Nature. 2005 Oct 27;437(7063):1291-8. doi: 10.1038/nature04131. Nature. 2005. PMID: 16251955 Review.
Cited by
-
Cooperation Survives and Cheating Pays in a Dynamic Network Structure with Unreliable Reputation.Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 2;6:27160. doi: 10.1038/srep27160. Sci Rep. 2016. PMID: 27251114 Free PMC article.
-
Personal experience and reputation interact in human decisions to help reciprocally.Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Feb 27;280(1757):20123044. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.3044. Print 2013 Apr 22. Proc Biol Sci. 2013. PMID: 23446528 Free PMC article.
-
Partner Choice Drives the Evolution of Cooperation via Indirect Reciprocity.PLoS One. 2015 Jun 9;10(6):e0129442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129442. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26057241 Free PMC article.
-
Indirect reciprocity is sensitive to costs of information transfer.Sci Rep. 2013;3:1435. doi: 10.1038/srep01435. Sci Rep. 2013. PMID: 23486389 Free PMC article.
-
Social image concerns promote cooperation more than altruistic punishment.Nat Commun. 2016 Aug 9;7:12288. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12288. Nat Commun. 2016. PMID: 27504898 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous