Surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum
- PMID: 9637543
- PMCID: PMC1191380
- DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199806000-00003
Surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum
Abstract
Objective: The authors' aim was to determine survival and recurrence rates in patients undergoing resection of rectal cancer achieved by abdominoperineal resection (APR), coloanal anastomosis (CAA), and anterior resection (AR) without adjuvant therapy.
Summary background data: The surgery of rectal cancer is controversial; so, too, is its adjuvant management. Questions such as preoperative versus postoperative radiation versus no radiation are key. An approach in which the entire mesorectum is excised has been proposed as yielding low recurrence rates.
Methods: Of 1423 patients with resected rectal cancers, 491 patients were excluded, leaving 932 with a primary adenocarcinoma of the rectum treated at Mayo. Eighty-six percent were resected for cure. Surgery plus adjuvant treatment was performed in 418, surgery alone in 514. These 514 patients are the subject of this review. Among the 514 patients who underwent surgery alone, APR was performed in 169, CAA in 19, AR in 272, and other procedures in 54. Eighty-seven percent of patients were operated on with curative intent. The mean follow-up was 5.6 years; follow-up was complete in 92%. APR and CAA were performed excising the envelope of rectal mesentery posteriorly and the supporting tissues laterally from the sacral promontory to the pelvic floor. AR was performed using an appropriately wide rectal mesentery resection technique if the tumor was high; if the tumor was in the middle or low rectum, all mesentery was resected. The mean distal margin achieved by AR was 3 +/- 2 cm.
Results: Mortality was 2% (12 of 514). Anastomotic leaks after AR occurred in 5% (16 of 291) and overall transient urinary retention in 15%. Eleven percent of patients had a wound infection (abdominal and perineal wound, 30-day, purulence, or cellulitis). The local recurrence and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 7% and 78%, respectively, after AR; 6% and 83%, respectively, after CAA; and 4% and 80%, respectively, after APR. Patients with stage III disease, had a 60% disease-free survival rate.
Conclusions: Complete resection of the envelope of supporting tissues about the rectum during APR, CAA, and AR when tumors were low in the rectum is associated with low mortality, low morbidity, low local recurrence, and good 5-year survival rates. Appropriate "tumor-specific" mesorectal excision during AR when the tumor is high in the rectum is likewise consistent with a low rate of local recurrence and good long-term survival. However, the overall failure rate of 40% in stage III disease (which is independent of surgical technique) means that surgical approaches alone are not sufficient to achieve better long-term survival rates.
Similar articles
-
Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jan;19(1):154-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1952-4. Epub 2011 Aug 6. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012. PMID: 21822556
-
Changing operative strategy from abdominoperineal resection to sphincter preservation in T3 low rectal cancer after downstaging by neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a preliminary report.World J Surg. 2015 May;39(5):1248-56. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2930-3. World J Surg. 2015. PMID: 25561197
-
Multimedia article. Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection with colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Nov;51(11):1710-1. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9322-4. Epub 2008 Aug 5. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008. PMID: 18679748
-
Survival and recurrence after low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: the results of a long-term study with a review of the literature.Surg Today. 1993;23(1):21-30. doi: 10.1007/BF00308995. Surg Today. 1993. PMID: 8461602 Review.
-
Clinical and molecular prognostic factors in sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer.Semin Radiat Oncol. 1998 Jan;8(1):54-69. doi: 10.1016/s1053-4296(98)80038-6. Semin Radiat Oncol. 1998. PMID: 9516585 Review.
Cited by
-
Elevated preoperative CEA is associated with worse survival in stage I-III rectal cancer patients.Br J Cancer. 2012 Jul 10;107(2):266-74. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.267. Epub 2012 Jun 26. Br J Cancer. 2012. PMID: 22735902 Free PMC article.
-
Short- and midterm outcomes of laparoscopic surgery compared for 131 patients with rectal and rectosigmoid cancer.Surg Endosc. 2007 Jun;21(6):920-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9132-5. Epub 2007 Feb 7. Surg Endosc. 2007. PMID: 17285382
-
Preoperative evaluation of colorectal neoplasms by colonoscopic miniprobe ultrasonography.Ann Surg. 2000 Jul;232(1):46-50. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200007000-00007. Ann Surg. 2000. PMID: 10862194 Free PMC article.
-
Advantages of robotic surgery for rectal cancer compared to laparoscopic surgery: pelvic anatomy and its impact on urinary dysfunction.J Robot Surg. 2024 Sep 11;18(1):338. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02095-2. J Robot Surg. 2024. PMID: 39261385
-
Risk factors of early postoperative small bowel obstruction following a proctectomy for rectal cancer.J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011 Dec;27(6):315-21. doi: 10.3393/jksc.2011.27.6.315. Epub 2011 Dec 31. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011. PMID: 22259747 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous