Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1998 May-Jun;13(3):322-32.

The treatment dilemma of the furcated molar: root resection versus single-tooth implant restoration. A literature review

Affiliations
  • PMID: 9638002
Review

The treatment dilemma of the furcated molar: root resection versus single-tooth implant restoration. A literature review

R P Kinsel et al. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998 May-Jun.

Erratum in

  • Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998 Sep-Oct;13(5):720

Abstract

Successful treatment of furcated molar teeth presents the periodontist and prosthodontist with a challenging dilemma. Accepted treatment modalities include chemotherapeutic maintenance, root planning, open flap debridement, modified Widman flap, bone grafting with and without guided tissue regeneration, and osseous resection with and without root removal. Determining the appropriate treatment for an individual patient that is both cost-effective and offers the greatest long-term prognosis can be a daunting task. The literature is replete with studies of different therapeutic alternatives for furcated molar teeth. A relatively new treatment option is complete removal of the tooth combined with ultimate placement of an endosseous implant and restoration with a single crown. A review of the relevant literature with special emphasis on root resection therapy and single molar implant placement is presented. The relative merits of each treatment modality and guidelines for their use are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by