An "all comers" policy for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: how can results be improved?
- PMID: 9641367
- DOI: 10.1080/110241598750004481
An "all comers" policy for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: how can results be improved?
Abstract
Objective: To review our experience of a non-selective policy for the treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm to see if the policy was justified, and to identify any preoperative risk factors that adversely influenced outcome.
Design: Retrospective study.
Setting: Teaching hospital, Republic of Ireland.
Subjects: 258 patients admitted with abdominal aortic aneurysms between January 1982 and December 1993.
Interventions: Definitive surgical treatment.
Main outcome measures: Morbidity, mortality, and risk factors.
Results: In-hospital mortality for all patients was 43% (110/258). Overall, women did worse than men (28/44, 64%, died, compared with 96/214, 45%, p=0.03). The mortality among patients over the age of 80 (23/45, 51%) was not significantly different from that among younger patients (97/202, 48%). Blood pressure, platelet count, and haemoglobin concentration were all significantly lower preoperatively among those who died (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: Age alone cannot be used to justify witholding definitive surgical treatment. Treatment should be aimed towards reversing haematological and haemodynamic abnormalities preoperatively to try to improve outcome.