Categories of auditory performance: inter-user reliability
- PMID: 9643302
- DOI: 10.3109/03005364000000045
Categories of auditory performance: inter-user reliability
Abstract
Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) describes a scale used to rate outcomes from paediatric cochlear implantation in everyday life. It differs from more technical measures by being readily applied and easily understood by non-specialist professionals and by parents. Being based on subjective assessments, there is a need to establish whether ratings by different persons are comparable. Therefore, an analysis of inter-user reliability was undertaken using ratings from 23 children followed up at various intervals after implantation. Analysis relating scores by local teachers of the deaf and the teachers of the deaf at the implant centre revealed very high inter-user reliability (correlation coefficient 0.97). This result establishes the reliability of CAP as an outcome measure for use in cochlear implant programmes.
Similar articles
-
Reliability of a rating scale for measuring speech intelligibility after pediatric cochlear implantation.Otol Neurotol. 2001 Sep;22(5):631-3. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200109000-00012. Otol Neurotol. 2001. PMID: 11568670
-
[The study of auditory performance of prelingual deaf cochlear implant recipients using Chinese version of categories of auditory performance].Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Mar;29(5):441-4. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015. PMID: 26103666 Chinese.
-
CHARGE syndrome and Cochlear implantation: difficulties and outcomes in the paediatric population.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Apr;79(4):487-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Jan 19. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015. PMID: 25649713
-
Is there a critical period for cochlear implantation in congenitally deaf children? Analyses of hearing and speech perception performance after implantation.Dev Psychobiol. 2005 Apr;46(3):252-61. doi: 10.1002/dev.20052. Dev Psychobiol. 2005. PMID: 15772969 Review.
-
Cochlear implantation: a review of the literature and the Nijmegen results.J Laryngol Otol. 1997 Nov;111(11):1008-17. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100139234. J Laryngol Otol. 1997. PMID: 9472567 Review.
Cited by
-
Speech Auditory Brainstem Responses in Adult Hearing Aid Users: Effects of Aiding and Background Noise, and Prediction of Behavioral Measures.Trends Hear. 2019 Jan-Dec;23:2331216519848297. doi: 10.1177/2331216519848297. Trends Hear. 2019. PMID: 31264513 Free PMC article.
-
Cochlear implantation in prelingually deaf children with white matter lesions.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Feb;278(2):323-329. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06075-8. Epub 2020 May 28. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021. PMID: 32462235
-
Long-term results of cochlear implantation in children with congenital single-sided deafness.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Sep;278(9):3245-3255. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06409-6. Epub 2020 Oct 20. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021. PMID: 33079248 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of outcomes of hearing and speech rehabilitation in children with cochlear implantation.J Otol. 2019 Jun;14(2):57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.joto.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Feb 5. J Otol. 2019. PMID: 31223302 Free PMC article.
-
Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in Pediatrics with Inner Ear Malformations in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Ahvaz.Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Apr;75(Suppl 1):197-203. doi: 10.1007/s12070-022-03339-z. Epub 2022 Dec 17. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023. PMID: 37206753 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Miscellaneous