Sex differences in right hemisphere tasks
- PMID: 9647685
- DOI: 10.1006/brcg.1998.0999
Sex differences in right hemisphere tasks
Abstract
We tested the hypothesis that sex differences in spatial ability and emotional perception are due to sex differences in intrahemispheric organization of the right hemisphere. If the right hemisphere is differently organized by sex-primarily specialized for spatial ability in men, but primarily specialized for emotional perception in women-then there should be a negative correlation between spatial ability and emotional perception within sex, and the greatest disparity between abilities should be found in people with characteristic arousal of the right hemisphere. Undergraduate men (N = 86) and women (N = 132) completed tests of Mental Rotation, Surface Development, Profile of Nonverbal Sensitivity, Progressive Matrices, and Chimeric Faces. Although the expected pattern of sex differences was observed, there was no evidence for the hypothesized negative correlation between spatial ability and emotional perception, even after statistical control of general intelligence.
Copyright 1998 Academic Press.
Similar articles
-
Sex differences in spatial ability: a lateralization of function approach.Brain Cogn. 2004 Dec;56(3):332-43. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.09.002. Brain Cogn. 2004. PMID: 15522772 Clinical Trial.
-
Gender differences in the relationship between emotional intelligence and right hemisphere lateralization for facial processing.Brain Cogn. 2010 Jun;73(1):62-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.03.003. Epub 2010 Mar 28. Brain Cogn. 2010. PMID: 20350776
-
An fMRI study of sex differences in regional activation to a verbal and a spatial task.Brain Lang. 2000 Sep;74(2):157-70. doi: 10.1006/brln.2000.2325. Brain Lang. 2000. PMID: 10950912
-
Cerebral lateralization of spatial abilities: a meta-analysis.Brain Cogn. 2003 Jul;52(2):197-204. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2626(03)00056-3. Brain Cogn. 2003. PMID: 12821102 Review.
-
Biological correlates of high mathematical reasoning ability.Prog Brain Res. 1984;61:469-90. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)64455-6. Prog Brain Res. 1984. PMID: 6396712 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Individual differences in spatial relation processing: effects of strategy, ability, and gender.Brain Cogn. 2011 Jun;76(1):184-90. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.01.008. Epub 2011 Feb 24. Brain Cogn. 2011. PMID: 21353361 Free PMC article.
-
Cognitive and default-mode resting state networks: do male and female brains "rest" differently?Hum Brain Mapp. 2010 Nov;31(11):1713-26. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20968. Hum Brain Mapp. 2010. PMID: 20725910 Free PMC article.
-
The organization of intrinsic brain activity differs between genders: a resting-state fMRI study in a large cohort of young healthy subjects.Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Jun;34(6):1330-43. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21514. Epub 2012 Feb 22. Hum Brain Mapp. 2013. PMID: 22359372 Free PMC article.
-
Differences in cognitive ability and apparent sex differences in corpus callosum size.Psychol Res. 2016 Sep;80(5):853-9. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0688-3. Epub 2015 Jul 25. Psychol Res. 2016. PMID: 26208632
-
Combining graph and machine learning methods to analyze differences in functional connectivity across sex.Open Neuroimag J. 2012;6:1-9. doi: 10.2174/1874440001206010001. Epub 2012 Jan 26. Open Neuroimag J. 2012. PMID: 22312418 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources