Finding, evaluating, refining, and applying empirically supported treatments for children and adolescents

Abstract

Structured child and adolescent treatments, tested through controlled clinical trials, have produced beneficial effects in hundreds of studies. By contrast, the limited pool or research on traditional clinical treatments raises doubts about their effectiveness. Thus, identification of empirically supported treatments may contribute something of real value to clinical practice and training. The Child Task Force report represents an important initial step in this direction. Here we offer both praise and critique, suggesting a number of ways the task force process and product may be improved. In addition, we suggest several ways to strengthen and enrich the clinical trials research available to the Task Force, emphasizing the need to test empirically supported treatments with referred youth in practice settings.