Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1998 May;77(5):497-9.

Nuchal translucency as a screening test for chromosomal abnormalities in a routine first trimester ultrasound examination

Affiliations
  • PMID: 9654169

Nuchal translucency as a screening test for chromosomal abnormalities in a routine first trimester ultrasound examination

A Josefsson et al. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998 May.

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the implementation of nuchal translucency measurement as an additional examination within the first trimester routine ultrasound in an unselected population of women.

Methods: A prospective study in which all pregnant women during 1994, referred for the first trimester routine ultrasound scan, were asked to participate. Of a total of 1852 women with a viable pregnancy, results from 1444 women were evaluated. When a nuchal translucency of 4 mm or more was found, the woman was offered both a genetic amniocentesis in gestational week 13-15 and an additional ultrasound examination in gestational week 18-19.

Results: Six fetuses had a nuchal translucency of 4 mm or more and none of these had any chromosomal abnormality. Neither had any of the fetuses in the study, karyotyped for other reasons, any chromosomal defect and nor was there any child born with aneuploidy in the study population. No strong relation between major malformations e.g. abnormalities of the heart and increased nuchal translucency was found. The fetus with the largest nuchal translucency (=6 mm) was born healthy.

Conclusion: The efficacy of nuchal translucency measurement needs further evaluation before it can be introduced as a screening method in an unselected pregnant population.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources