Similar articles

• Sensitivity of primary screening by rapid review: 'to act or not to act on the results, that is the question'.

  Slater DN. Slater DN. Cytopathology. 1998 Apr;9(2):77-83. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.1998.00136.x. Cytopathology. 1998. PMID: 9577733 Review. No abstract available.
• The sensitivity of rapid (partial) review of cervical smears.

  Shield PW, Cox NC. Shield PW, et al. Cytopathology. 1998 Apr;9(2):84-92. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.1998.00138.x. Cytopathology. 1998. PMID: 9577734
• [An operative model: verification of the quality of the screening Pap test ].

  Montanari GR, Arnaud S, Berardengo E, Campione D, Cozzani C, Parisio F, Viberti L, Ghiringhello B. Montanari GR, et al. Pathologica. 2001 Oct;93(5):609-10. Pathologica. 2001. PMID: 11725370 Italian. No abstract available.
• Rapid rescreening.

  Rubin A. Rubin A. Cytopathology. 1998 Apr;9(2):141-2. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.1998.0137d.x. Cytopathology. 1998. PMID: 9577744 No abstract available.
• Evaluation of cervical cytology.

  McCrory DC, Matchar DB, Bastian L, Datta S, Hasselblad V, Hickey J, Myers E, Nanda K. McCrory DC, et al. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 1999 Jan;(5):1-6. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 1999. PMID: 11925972 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.