Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of myocardial perfusion
- PMID: 9662231
- DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00057-5
Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of myocardial perfusion
Abstract
Noninvasive qualitative/quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion is considered to be fundamental in the management of known and suspected coronary artery disease patients, as shown by the widespread utilization of thallium-201- and technetium-99m-labeled agents in myocardial single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scintigraphy for diagnostic as well as prognostic purposes. Recently, the availability of subsecond ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences (FLASH, TurboFLASH, EPI) has provided new avenues for assessing myocardial perfusion by MRI in conjunction with contrast-agent bolus administration (contrast-enhanced first-pass MRI). MRI contrast agents can be classified into relaxation agents (T1 "positive") and susceptibility agents (T2 star [T2*] "negative"). All the commercially available MRI contrast agents used in clinical practice are relaxation agents employing the T1 shortening effect of metal ions like gadolinium (paramagnetism), thus producing a tissue signal-intensity increase on T1-weighted images (positive enhancement). On the other hand, T2* agents induce mainly susceptibility effects, i.e., rapid dephasing of spins with resultant signal loss on T2*-sensitive sequences (negative enhancement). Unfortunately, both relaxation and susceptibility agents are, by definition, "extracellular" contrast media, as they rapidly diffuse into the interstitial space, thus hampering the simple application of indicator-dilution kinetics for myocardial perfusion assessment. Blood pool agents are therefore needed to obtain predictable relations between the concentration of contrast medium in the myocardium and the change in signal intensity. In addition, newer MRI techniques for tissue perfusion quantitation have been recently reported, based on blood-sensitive sequences, thus without intravenous contrast administration.
Similar articles
-
Cardiac MRI for assessment of myocardial perfusion: current status and future perspectives.J Nucl Cardiol. 2001 Mar-Apr;8(2):207-14. doi: 10.1067/mnc.2001.112539. J Nucl Cardiol. 2001. PMID: 11295699 Review.
-
[Myocardial microcirculation in humans--new approaches using MRI].Herz. 2003 Mar;28(2):74-81. doi: 10.1007/s00059-003-2451-6. Herz. 2003. PMID: 12669220 German.
-
Assessment of myocardial perfusion by magnetic resonance imaging.Herz. 1997 Feb;22(1):16-28. doi: 10.1007/BF03044567. Herz. 1997. PMID: 9088937 Review.
-
Assessment of myocardial perfusion using contrast-enhanced MR imaging: current status and future developments.MAGMA. 1995 Mar;3(1):21-33. doi: 10.1007/BF02426397. MAGMA. 1995. PMID: 7600173 Review.
-
Concepts of myocardial perfusion imaging in magnetic resonance imaging.Magn Reson Q. 1994 Dec;10(4):249-86. Magn Reson Q. 1994. PMID: 7873354 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging in coronary heart disease: the CE-MARC study.Trials. 2009 Jul 29;10:62. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-62. Trials. 2009. PMID: 19640271 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Brain imaging: the NMR revolution. Interview by Clare Thompson.BMJ. 1999 Nov 13;319(7220):1302. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7220.1302. BMJ. 1999. PMID: 10559054 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Cardiac MRI for assessment of myocardial perfusion: current status and future perspectives.J Nucl Cardiol. 2001 Mar-Apr;8(2):207-14. doi: 10.1067/mnc.2001.112539. J Nucl Cardiol. 2001. PMID: 11295699 Review.
-
Application of paramagnetically tagged molecules for magnetic resonance imaging of biofilm mass transport processes.Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Jun;76(12):4027-36. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03016-09. Epub 2010 Apr 30. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010. PMID: 20435773 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical