Accidental needlesticks in the phlebotomy service of the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology at Mayo Clinic Rochester
- PMID: 9663188
- DOI: 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)64883-0
Accidental needlesticks in the phlebotomy service of the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology at Mayo Clinic Rochester
Abstract
Objective: To determine the change in accidental needlestick rates in the Phlebotomy Service at Mayo Clinic Rochester and to identify safety practices implemented from 1983 through 1996.
Material and methods: We retrospectively reviewed yearly Phlebotomy Service accidental needlestick rates from 1983 through 1996. Interviews were conducted with representatives of the Infection Control Committee and the management team for the Phlebotomy Service, and minutes of meetings of these two groups were reviewed to identify implemented safety improvements that may have had an effect on accidental needlestick exposures.
Results: Accidental needlestick exposures in the Phlebotomy Service declined from a high of 1.5/10,000 venipunctures to 0.2/10,000 venipunctures. Several safety improvements were made during that time, including the implementation of a one-handed recapping block, change to single-use evacuated tube holders, increased number and improved locations of disposal containers for needles, implementation of resheathing needles and retractable capillary puncture devices, discontinuation of the practice of changing needles before inoculation of blood culture bottles, increased emphasis on safety for new and experienced phlebotomists, and improved exposure reporting tools.
Conclusion: We believe that the decrease in our accidental needlestick exposure rate is correlated with the changes in education, practices, and products that we have implemented.
Comment in
-
Phlebotomists at risk.Mayo Clin Proc. 1998 Jul;73(7):703-4. doi: 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)64898-2. Mayo Clin Proc. 1998. PMID: 9663203 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Use of needle safety devices by clinical laboratories in North Carolina hospitals.Clin Leadersh Manag Rev. 2003 Jan-Feb;17(1):21-5. Clin Leadersh Manag Rev. 2003. PMID: 12592873
-
Phlebotomists at risk.Mayo Clin Proc. 1998 Jul;73(7):703-4. doi: 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)64898-2. Mayo Clin Proc. 1998. PMID: 9663203 No abstract available.
-
Sharps injuries. Time to change our equipment and attitudes.Can Nurse. 2003 Oct;99(9):18-22. Can Nurse. 2003. PMID: 14621529 No abstract available.
-
Needle safety technology.SCI Nurs. 2002 Spring;19(1):17-20. SCI Nurs. 2002. PMID: 12510500 Review. No abstract available.
-
Needlesticks with safety devices and accident prevention: an integrative review.Rev Bras Enferm. 2018 Nov-Dec;71(6):3084-3092. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0719. Rev Bras Enferm. 2018. PMID: 30517415 Review. English, Portuguese.
Cited by
-
Criteria for successful hepatitis B vaccination in adults: results of a case study.Infection. 2009 Jun;37(3):266-9. doi: 10.1007/s15010-008-7410-y. Epub 2008 Oct 14. Infection. 2009. PMID: 18854934
-
Long-term persistence of seroprotection by hepatitis B vaccination in healthcare workers of southern Italy.Hepat Mon. 2012 Sep;12(9):e6025. doi: 10.5812/hepatmon.6025. Epub 2012 Sep 4. Hepat Mon. 2012. PMID: 23087756 Free PMC article.
-
Risk Reduction of Needle Stick Injuries Due to Continuous Shift from Unsafe to Safe Instruments at a German University Hospital.Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp). 2016 Aug 23;6(3):227-237. doi: 10.1556/1886.2016.00025. eCollection 2016 Sep 29. Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp). 2016. PMID: 27766172 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical