Blood pressure measurement in epidemiological studies: a comparative analysis of two methods. Data from the EPIC-Potsdam Study. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition
- PMID: 9663913
- DOI: 10.1097/00004872-199816060-00004
Blood pressure measurement in epidemiological studies: a comparative analysis of two methods. Data from the EPIC-Potsdam Study. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the impact of a device replacement in blood pressure measurement in epidemiological studies on comparison and interpretation of epidemiological data by replacing traditional aneroid manometry with automated oscillometric devices.
Design: Within the context of a continuing epidemiological study (EPIC-Potsdam Study), blood pressure measurements were performed simultaneously with an aneroid sphygmomanometer and an automated oscillometric device for each subject. We randomly selected 400 men and women from the main study population and one observer performed three consecutive blood pressure measurements for each subject according to a standardized procedure. In total, 10 oscillometric devices of the same type were used. Demographic and anthropometric data for each subject were obtained by trained interviewers.
Results: The mean difference between the aneroid and the oscillometric measurements of systolic blood pressure was 0.2 +/- 5.6 mmHg (aneroid value greater, NS), whereas the mean difference in diastolic blood pressure, 0.5 +/- 3.5 mmHg (aneroid value smaller), attained statistical significance (P = 0.0001). Estimates of prevalence for hypertension differed by 0.4% for women, and by 2.9% for men. Associations with the differences between methods were observed with age, blood pressure, lean body mass, upper arm circumference and specific devices without indicating a strong and consistent pattern.
Conclusions: The use of automated oscillometric devices in epidemiological studies introduces a bias of very small magnitude compared with use of the aneroid method. The effect of the change to this automated measurement procedure on prevalence estimates is small but might affect comparability of data. Minor differences in measurement performance between devices of one type might affect population parameters.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of aneroid and oscillometric blood pressure measurements in children.J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2013 Nov;15(11):776-83. doi: 10.1111/jch.12196. Epub 2013 Sep 20. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2013. PMID: 24112661 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of blood pressure measurements between an automated oscillometric device and a Hawksley random-zero sphygmomanometer in the northern Sweden MONICA study.Blood Press Monit. 2012 Aug;17(4):164-70. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e328356ef58. Blood Press Monit. 2012. PMID: 22781634 Clinical Trial.
-
Home self-monitoring of blood pressure: is fully automated oscillometric technique as good as conventional stethoscopic technique?Am J Hypertens. 1997 Apr;10(4 Pt 1):428-33. Am J Hypertens. 1997. PMID: 9128209 Clinical Trial.
-
Can an automatic oscillometric device replace a mercury sphygmomanometer on blood pressure measurement? a systematic review and meta-analysis.Blood Press Monit. 2019 Dec;24(6):265-276. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000412. Blood Press Monit. 2019. PMID: 31658107
-
The effect of differences in measurement procedure on the comparability of blood pressure estimates in multi-centre studies.Blood Press Monit. 2002 Apr;7(2):95-104. doi: 10.1097/00126097-200204000-00002. Blood Press Monit. 2002. PMID: 12048426 Review.
Cited by
-
Traditional risk factors for essential hypertension: analysis of their specific combinations in the EPIC-Potsdam cohort.Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 6;9(1):1501. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38783-5. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 30728434 Free PMC article.
-
Alcohol intake and pancreatic cancer risk: An analysis from 30 prospective studies across Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America.PLoS Med. 2025 May 20;22(5):e1004590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004590. eCollection 2025 May. PLoS Med. 2025. PMID: 40392909 Free PMC article.
-
Difference in blood pressure readings with mercury and automated devices: Impact on hypertension prevalence estimates in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21(6):427-33. doi: 10.1007/s10654-006-9015-z. Epub 2006 Jul 7. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006. PMID: 16826452 Clinical Trial.
-
Differences of blood pressure estimates between consecutive measurements on one occasion: implications for inter-study comparability of epidemiologic studies.Eur J Epidemiol. 2000;16(10):891-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1011020823807. Eur J Epidemiol. 2000. PMID: 11338119
-
Discordance in national estimates of hypertension among young adults.Epidemiology. 2011 Jul;22(4):532-41. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31821c79d2. Epidemiology. 2011. PMID: 21610501 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous