Prenatal diagnosis of major malformations: quality control of routine ultrasound examinations based on a five-year study of 20,248 newborn fetuses and infants
- PMID: 9664601
Prenatal diagnosis of major malformations: quality control of routine ultrasound examinations based on a five-year study of 20,248 newborn fetuses and infants
Abstract
Antenatal ultrasound screening for birth defects is increasingly becoming a routine procedure of prenatal care. Prenatal detection of malformations and subsequent adjustment of obstetric management are essential for secondary prevention. It is unknown whether ultrasound screening is effective in all pregnant women, or should only be performed in high risk populations. From 1990-1994, 20,248 livebirths, stillbirths and abortions underwent physical and sonographic examinations and anamnestic data were collected. To identify the high risk group, case control analyses of births with one of the 23 selected major malformations (controls) were performed with respect to anamnestic risk factors. All women had at least three routine ultrasound scans. The selected malformations were diagnosed in 298 children; 95 (30.3 per cent) were diagnosed antenatally. Detection rates were: CNS (68.6 per cent), gastro-intestinal tract (42.3 per cent), urinary system (24.1) per cent), heart (5.9 per cent). Complications during pregnancy were calculated as indicators of congenital anomalies: premature labour (< 28 week) OR 4.7 (3.8-5.9), placental insufficiency OR 1.9 (1.1-2.7) and vaginal bleeding OR 1.5 (1.2-1.8), etc. Antenatal routine ultrasound screening is not effective risk populations. Anamnestic risk factors risk factors during pregnancy may be essential indicators for identifying high risk populations. We propose screening of the described high risk pregnancies (about 22 per cent of all pregnancies) to be performed by specially trained and highly experienced ultrasonographers to increase sensitivity rates and benefit cost effectiveness.
Similar articles
-
Ultrasonography in pregnancy and fetal abnormalities: screening or diagnostic test? IPIMC 1986-1990 register data. Indagine Policentrica Italiana sulle Malformazioni Congenite.Prenat Diagn. 1995 Dec;15(12):1101-8. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970151204. Prenat Diagn. 1995. PMID: 8750288
-
Routine obstetrical ultrasound at 18-22 weeks: our experience on 7,236 fetuses.J Matern Fetal Med. 1999 Mar-Apr;8(2):64-9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6661(199903/04)8:2<64::AID-MFM7>3.0.CO;2-D. J Matern Fetal Med. 1999. PMID: 10090494
-
Utility of follow-up standard sonography for fetal anomaly detection.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jun;222(6):615.e1-615.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Jan 10. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 31930994
-
Factors affecting risks of congenital malformations. II. Effect of maternal diabetes on congenital malformations.Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1975;11(10):23-38. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1975. PMID: 769859 Review.
-
Ultrasound screening for fetal structural anomalies.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Apr;5(2):204-10. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1993. PMID: 8490090 Review.
Cited by
-
Renal development in the fetus and premature infant.Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Apr;22(2):58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Feb 1. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017. PMID: 28161315 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound screening for fetal structural abnormalities during the first and second trimester of pregnancy in low-risk and unselected populations.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 9;5(5):CD014715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014715.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38721874 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Another Case of De Novo 3q26.33q27.3 Microdeletion and Its Medicolegal Sequel.Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb 7;2018:1909056. doi: 10.1155/2018/1909056. eCollection 2018. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29552365 Free PMC article.
-
Care-related factors associated with antepartal diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction: a case-control study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Oct 31;14:371. doi: 10.1186/s12884-014-0371-5. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014. PMID: 25363152 Free PMC article.
-
The Evaluation of Genetic Diagnosis on High-Risk Fetal CAKUT.Front Genet. 2022 May 31;13:869525. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.869525. eCollection 2022. Front Genet. 2022. PMID: 35711925 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical