Head, neck, and mandible dynamics generated by 'whiplash'
- PMID: 9666248
- DOI: 10.1016/s0001-4575(97)00091-2
Head, neck, and mandible dynamics generated by 'whiplash'
Abstract
That injuries to the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) can be imposed by short-acting forces generated during rear-end collisions of motor vehicles was first proposed more than 50 years ago. Since that time, numerous anecdotal and clinical reports relating the onset of TMJ symptoms to low-velocity rear-end collisions have appeared in the literature. Various mechanisms of injury to the TMJ occurring during extension and flexion phases of 'whiplash' have been proposed. However, transient forces developed at the TMJ in impact velocity changes on the order of 8.0 kilometers per hour (km/h) have been shown to be well within typical physiologic ranges. This study applies current head/neck extension-flexion dynamic data to develop linear and angular force-time histories experienced at the TMJ. Fourteen test collisions of motor vehicles utilizing seven live test subjects were conducted in July 1993. Linear and angular accelerometers and high-speed photographic cameras recorded the vehicle and human-subject responses. Head accelerations and forces generated at the TMJ bore a generally linear relationship to the impact velocity changes in the range tested (3.9-10.9 km/h). Mandibular opening responses were measured on three test subjects. Neither neck hyperflexion nor hyperextension occurred for any subject on any trial. At some point in the series, all test subjects experienced neck muscle strain symptoms lasting 1-3 days. No TMJ symptoms were experienced. The head, neck, and mandible motions occurring in the 'whiplash' maneuver are more complex than previously described. The cervical muscle injury threshold appears to be reached in the 8.0 km/h range. Linear and rotational forces generated at the TMJ in rear-end impacts below the 11.0 km/h velocity-change level do not appear to be injurious.
Similar articles
-
Temporomandibular joint injury potential imposed by the low-velocity extension-flexion maneuver.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995 Mar;53(3):256-62; discussion 263. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(95)90220-1. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995. PMID: 7861275
-
Do "whiplash injuries" occur in low-speed rear impacts?Eur Spine J. 1997;6(6):366-75. doi: 10.1007/BF01834062. Eur Spine J. 1997. PMID: 9455663 Free PMC article.
-
Modeling of jaw-head-neck dynamics during whiplash.J Dent Res. 1989 Sep;68(9):1360-5. doi: 10.1177/00220345890680091401. J Dent Res. 1989. PMID: 2778179
-
Computational studies of 'whiplash' injuries.Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2001;215(2):181-9. doi: 10.1243/0954411011533742. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2001. PMID: 11382077 Review.
-
Whiplash injuries of the temporomandibular joint in motor vehicle accidents: speculations and facts.J Oral Rehabil. 1998 Oct;25(10):731-46. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00321.x. J Oral Rehabil. 1998. PMID: 9802580 Review.
Cited by
-
Prevalence of Temporomandibular Disorder Symptoms After Whiplash Trauma-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Eur J Pain. 2025 Mar;29(3):e4792. doi: 10.1002/ejp.4792. Eur J Pain. 2025. PMID: 39921489 Free PMC article.
-
Study of the Emergency Braking Test with an Autonomous Bus and the sEMG Neck Response by Means of a Low-Cost System.Micromachines (Basel). 2020 Oct 13;11(10):931. doi: 10.3390/mi11100931. Micromachines (Basel). 2020. PMID: 33066252 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of right anterolateral impacts: the effect of trunk flexion on the cervical muscle whiplash response.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2006 May 16;3:10. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-3-10. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2006. PMID: 16704734 Free PMC article.
-
Surface Electromyography Study Using a Low-Cost System: Are There Neck Muscles Differences When the Passenger Is Warned during an Emergency Braking Inside an Autonomous Vehicle?Sensors (Basel). 2021 Aug 9;21(16):5378. doi: 10.3390/s21165378. Sensors (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34450818 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources